Saturday, January 30, 2010

George Grant's literature

http://www.commentary.net/freebooks/docs/a_pdfs/gggi.pdf

The Jesuits in Great Britain

http://www.reformation.org/jesuits-great-britain.html

King James (from Christkeep site)

Bible Study
False Doctrines
False Religions
False Prophets
Research & Studies
ChristKeep Library
King James VI & I
Site Map
Contact
King James and Edward de Vere discuss

King James

Edward de Vere
There have been many questions and “distortions” on Edward de Vere and King James; I hope to clear them up.
This artificial conversation between King James and Edward de Vere (modeled after Daemonologie) will go through REAL documents and quotes, as well to create a realistic conversation as possible integrating the nature of the two writers. It is indeed artificial; yet, I have integrated and extensively referenced everything of importance what King James and Edward de Vere have said and wrote.
Note: citations for referencing are labeled in red, whilst verses are labeled in green. All quotes from actual speeches are in an olive-green colour. All references are listed at the bottom of this document – please refer to them if you wish not to read the conversation I have created.

Edward de Vere: I am very glad to have met you this day; truly ye are the true shepherd of Christ’s flock [1]. There hath been controversies and doubt upon mine countenance, as well as distortion to your person. I think it is meet since thou canst removeth the veils of doubt, and cast the myths thereof into oblivion. Verily, thou art the correct one to dispatch the devil’s tidings.
King James: I perceive many of these questions shall consult upon God’s Word, and the sundry lack of studies from others who hath devised these devilish lies!
Edward de Vere: Firstly, I pray you, dispatch the argument used against us of our poetry and writings, and secondly, rebukes to the various actions we are accused of (such as Papistry, Witchcraft, and Sodomy).
King James: It is very meet that one writeth poetry away from the Bible, lest one confuseth the words of God therein like the papists [2]. If one should confront the Bible, there should be an distinguish of the two. I oft wrote of pagan gods in mine poems [3] – yet I was not ignorant of the true divine: Jesus Christ. Christ deserveth not to be stuffed in a poem (as the papists stuff their god in bread [4]); rather, Christ deserves the glory in truthful writings. I think one can shadow truths from Jesuits, the devil’s pernicious vermin [5], that teareth Christ from the hearts of men [Luke 8:12-13], as ye have done in Othello by calling them Turks [6], I also hath done the same in writing of them in mine Meditation of Revelation.
Edward de Vere: Indeed, I also hath exposed a plot of the Jesuits to kill that good Queen Elizabeth [7] in which they now have an unquenchable wrath against me. As ye know, Queen Elizabeth oft called me “her Turk” for that reason – and for my traveling to Italy. I think of a truth, that God’s Word to be influential and the source of wisdom, I did read mine Geneva Bible daily – for – faith cometh by hearing as ye have stated in the Basilikon Doron [Romans 10:17]. I hath wrote sundry references to the Words of God in my plays, sonnets, and other attributes thereon.
King James: This can be so if directly inferring without mixing the Bible, as you hath done in the Merchant of Venice on Act I, Scene 2, ye write: “I know it is a sin to be a mocker,” in this I applaud, ye even go to saith: “God defend me from these two,” for God is our defender [Psalm 31:2] and comforter [John 14:26]. However, thou should remember, the Apocrypha canst not be taken as God’s Word [8].
Edward de Vere: There hath been questions upon Freemasonry, what are the troubles therein that it merits? I certainly am accused of such an act – as ye are too.
King James: Indeed, Freemasonry in its highest forms goes against Biblical assets, one of the most prominent is of oaths, we are commanded not to swear or make an oath – lest they come at us upon the bema [9]. There wast occasions that I hath hired an Freemason for building by the name of William Schaw, and, attended their vain meetings (which is comparable to a papist mass of murmuring and repetitious prayer [10]) as part of a King’s duty; but only Christ is the truth, I never hath heeded their lies [11], nor have I gone in their rituals that climb high as the sins of Papistry [Revelation 18:5]. I heard there are many, who, believe that thou art a Freemason? This cannot be, you hath wrote in the sonnets: “And broils root out the work of masonry.” You surety wert addicted to learning thus have associated many aspects including Freemasonry (but as yet, ye never did entertain your countenance to be partaker and sup at the devil’s table, merely writing as a form of poetry). I assume this is but an jest of the masons and how your works shall pass for longevity, however, the Jesuits, those damnable Turks, may distort us in due time – but by the grace of God the truth shall remain.
Edward de Vere: Indeed I wast verily addicted to learning [12], I read books from afar on all subjects including Freemasonry – and if they wert far from mine sight – I did hath them commissioned and ordered such as the Geneva Bible I doth read. Thou art correct, truth shall remain as I have wrote: “For truth is truth, though never so old, and time cannot make that false which was once true.” I also referenced this in Measure for Measure: “For truth is truth, to the end of reckoning [13].” I would ask thee to dilate upon Papistry.
King James: Ye hath indeed tasted Papistry and Satan therein [7], also, being troubled by many Papists such as Vavasour’s uncle – who hath lamed thee (in which ye cleverly wrote of such in thy sonnets). In all certainty, you clearly abandoned the papists – for, they have indeed given you perdition – ye now come back to the truth and call me the true Shepherd of Christ’s flock. Concerning the Papist massacre of the Huguenots, from that devilish Gregory XIII, ye commented it: “And think, if the Admiral in France was an eyesore or beam in the eyes of the papists, that the Lord Treasurer of England is a block and a cross-bar in their way [14].” I hath written in Daemonologie, Basilikon Doron and Meditation on Revelation about the erring of Papists in numerous depths [15]. Clearly we are unfit to be Papists for we hath both enraged the Papacy. Of truth, Queen Elizabeth would indeed abhor us if we followed Papistry.
Edward de Vere: Please expound on the accusations of Sodomy.
King James: I reject Sodomy as a sinful practice in the Basilikon Doron; by doing those sins ye shall never forgive your conscience, or have an hard time doing so [16]. There hath been many who accused me of such; they wert removed from mine office and were erring in points of religion: they wrested God’s Words in their own conceits instead of following the precise rules set down [17]. As for you also, they maketh lies in their vain imaginations, Henry Howard, Charles Arundel, and Francis Southwell hath created a long list of false accusations [18], they vainly say ye hath taken a young Italian boy; this seems the more fraudulent that I can never believe it!
Edward de Vere: I would trouble you once more to refute claims of witchcraft and pagan philosophies that many attribute to our being.
King James: I believe I hath made it clear with the very title of my book “Daemonologie” that I wrest not my conscience with the devil or his devices therein that are a snare [19]. As for ye, it was, again, the three “Henry Howard, Charles Arundel, and Francis Southwell” who accused you of demonology.
Edward de Vere: I thank thee very much for clearing all matters up, and dispatching the devil into his place and all accusations thereof.
FINIS
References:
[1] Edward de Vere calls King James “the true shepherd of Christ’s flock” In a letter to Robert Cecil in 1603.
[2] King James writes in Daemonologie: “...and many words of God, confusedly wrapped in...” referring that people often mix God’s Word with pagan things – such as Catholics, Jesuits, Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Muslims, Freemasons etc.
[3] King James writes in his sonnet #10 “O Furious Mars, thow warlyke souldiour bold,” however, this is not inferring that King James believed in silly pagan Roman gods – it was simply poetry and meant to be taken as poetry, not as God’s Word or biblical studies.
[4] King James writes in Daemonologie: “I think it is so contrary to the quality of a natural body, and so like to the little transubstantiate god in the Papists’ Mass, that I can never believe it.”
[5] King James calls the Jesuits “pernicious vermin” in Meditation of Revelation, as well as expounding of “Turks” as well correlating to de Vere’s Othello.
[6] Edward de Vere writes in Othello: “The desperate tempest hath so bang’d the Turks That their designment halts...” Turks refers to the Jesuits and Armada.
[7] “During the latter 1570’s, the whole-souled Oxford had remained unsuspicious as his intimacy with his Catholic cousins and their circle of intellectual friends increased. Finally... they recklessly confided to him, in December, 1580, their plans to overthrow Elizabeth and place Mary Queen of Scots on the throne of England. To their horror, Oxford went at once to the Queen – the sovereign to whom, as a feudal knight, he had sworn undying fealty.” - The Renaissance Man of England, Dorothy and Carlton Ogburn
[8] King James writes in the Basilikon Doron: “And as to the Apocrypha books, I omit them, because I am no Papist, as I said before”
[9] King James writes in the Basilikon Doron: “and especially, beware to offend your conscience with use of swearing or lying (suppose but in jest): for oaths are but an use, and a sin clothed with no delight nor gain, and therefore the more inexcusable...” this is a very strong statement from King James, saying that oaths are the MORE inexcusable [before God].
[10] King James writes in Daemonologie: “And this far only I touch, that when the conjured Spirit appears, which will not be while after many circumstances, long prayers, and much muttering and murmuring of the conjurers; like a Papist priest, dispatching a hunting Mass...”
King James writes in the Basilikon Doron: “In your prayer, be neither over strange with God, like the ignorant common sort, that prayeth nothing but out of books”
[11] King James writes in the Basilikon Doron: “I thank God, I was never ashamed to give account of my profession, howsoever the malicious lying tongues of some have traduced me...”
King James writes in Daemonologie: “My intention in this labour, is only to prove two things, as I have already said: the one, that such devilish arts have been and are. The other, what exact trial and severe punishment they merit...”
King James writes in Daemonologie: “...the Law of God, wherein are all Magicians, Divines, Enchanters, Sorcerers, Witches, and whatsoever of that kind that consults with the Devil, plainly prohibited, and alike threatened against.”
[12] A poet in 1569 said this about Edward de Vere: “I do not deny that in many matters, I mean matters of learning, a nobleman ought to have a sight; but to be too much addicted that way, I think it is not good.”
[13] A quote that survives under Edward de Vere’s name: “For truth is truth, though never so old, and time cannot make that false which was once true.”
A quote inside Measure for Measure: “For truth is truth, to the end of reckoning.”
[14] Edward de Vere wrote this to William Cecil in 1572: “And think, if the Admiral in France was an eyesore or beam in the eyes of the papists, that the Lord Treasurer of England is a block and a cross-bar in their way.”
[15] “ ...holy-water (whereby the Devil mocks the Papists)...” - Daemonologie
“And therefore as in the time of Papistry, our fathers erring grossly, and through ignorance, that mist of errors overshadowed the Devil to walk the more familiarly amongst them...” – Daemonologie
“And therefore I would not have you to pray with the Papists, to be preserved from sudden death...” – Basilikon Doron
[16] King James writes in the Basilikon Doron: “There are some horrible crimes that ye are bound in conscience never to forgive: such as witchcraft, willful murder, incest, and sodomy.”
[17] King James writes in the Basilikon Doron: “But above all, beware ye wrest not the word to your [own] appetite, (as over many do), making it like a bell to sound as ye please to interpret: but by the contrary, frame all your affections to follow precisely the rules there set down.”
[18] Henry Howard, Charles Arundel, and Francis Southwell accused Edward de Vere of: demonology, heresy, treason, homosexuality, “buggering a boy that is his cook and many other boys,” such as one brought back from Italy, habitual drunkenness, declaring that Elizabeth had a bad singing voice, swearing to murder various courtiers etc. These are all false, and often, many people attribute these to be “factual” not understanding that their purpose was to spread lies about Edward de Vere.
[19] King James writes in Daemonologie: “...but only such, as first willfully deceives themselves, by running unto him, whom God then suffers to fall in their own snares, and justly permits them to be illuded with great efficacy of deceit, because they would not believe the truth (as Paul saith).”
Related Articles:
Basilikon Doron
Daemonologie
Meditation on Revelation [20:7-10]

Are you a Pharisee? Saved by Christ’s righteousness

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Avatar Script Reveals Cameron’s Hatred for Gun Owners

From http://www.infowars.com/avatar-script-reveals-camerons-hatred-for-gun-owners/


http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=53558&page=11


Avatar Script Reveals Cameron’s Hatred for Gun Owners
Text size


John Nolte
Big Government
January 13, 2010

A d v e r t i s e m e n t
This appears to be accurate. Both Ain’t It Cool News and JoBlo.com have posted James Cameron’s full “Avatar” script. To triple-check I went to the 20th Century-Fox site and found that they posted the same script, as well. After being as careful as possible (wouldn’t want to smear Cameron like he did the U.S. Marines. NOTE for Leftist hair-splitters: former Marines), I bring you a scene written by James Cameron that was cut from the final film but serves as a glimpse at the director’s childish prejudices and mindset:
INT. ARMOR BAY – DAY
TROOPERS issue automatic weapons and magazines to a long line of mine workers. The miners lock and load like the redblooded redneck NRA supporters they are.
BLASTING TECHS are setting radio-detonated primer charges into two-ton stacks of EXPLOSIVE COMPOUND. The stacks are band-strapped together on pallets.
TRACKING WITH SELFRIDGE, staring around him in growing dismay as he walks through the full-scale mobilization. He approaches Quaritch, who is barking orders amid a hive of activity around the ampsuits.
Read entire article

Research related links

We Are Change Confronts Carl Cameron on Media’s 9/11 Truth Ignorance
Vatican Slams ‘Avatar’: Promotes Nature Worship Over Religion
Alex Jones Reviews Avatar
Law & Order SVU: Following the ADL Script?
Gun Owners Not Welcome on Obama’s White House Team?
Movie Review: Avatar and Paganism
Some owners deserting factories in China
Newark Mayor Encourages Snitches to Turn In Gun Owners
Gun owners protest police action
Avatar a Mass Mind Manipulation Project?
Berlusconi Attack: Italians Say “Climate of Hatred” Splitting Nation
“Explosive” Senate Torture Report Reveals What We’ve Already Known For Three And A Half Years

Evolution

http://www.sightlerpublications.com/history/Baptists_SecondAmendment.htm

Baptists and the Second Amendment

http://www.sightlerpublications.com/history/Baptists_SecondAmendment.htm

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Jesuit information

http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?showtopic=4514

http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?showtopic=4098

The mini ice age starts here

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-mini-ice-age-starts-here.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1242011/DAVID-ROSE-The-mini-ice-age-starts-here.html

Obama’s TSA Nominee Targets Anti-Government Christians

From http://www.prisonplanet.com/obamas-tsa-nominee-targets-anti-government-christians.html



Obama’s TSA Nominee Targets Anti-Government Christians
Former FBI agent Southers says government should pay attention to political Americans
Paul Joseph WatsonPrison Planet.comTuesday, January 12, 2010
President Obama’s nominee to head the TSA and boss the naked body scanners now being installed at airports across the country says that white Christian “anti-government” types will be the primary target of suspicion for authorities.
Former FBI agent Erroll Southers has been under scrutiny following Republican efforts to block his confirmation after it emerged Southers had abused his power to run a database check on his ex-wife’s new boyfriend.
Back in October, Southers told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, both of whom voted on his confirmation, that he carried out the search because he was concerned for his wife and son. However, after the committees had approved him, Southers admitted that he had lied under oath by failing to reveal that he had personally conducted the search and had done so on more than one occasion, as well as sharing the information with the police (so they could harass the target of the search, according to the Ace of Spades blog).
Given that the potential future head of the TSA has abused his power in the past and then lied about it to Congress while under oath, how can we have any confidence that he will change the climate of corruption and thuggishness that pervades the TSA, as stories of innocent people being terrorized and harassed continue to appear on an almost daily basis?
In a video interview posted to You Tube yesterday, Southers states the the government and the TSA has to “pay attention” not to Muslim terrorists but to “anti-government, anti-abortion, survivalist types” who are “christian identity oriented,” before he links such individuals with neo-nazi white supremacists and people like Buford Furrow, a former Aryan Nations member who killed one and injured three during a shooting at the Los Angeles Jewish Community Center in August 1999.
Southers subsequently throws in Ben Smith, a spree killer who targeted members of racial and ethnic minorities in random drive-by shootings in Illinois and Indiana in July 1999.
“Those groups are groups that claim to be extremely anti-government and christian identity oriented,” added Southers.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

As we have exhaustively documented for years, even if there were hordes of Muslim terrorists planning to bomb airliners, the federal government is far more concerned with what politically active conservative and libertarian Americans are up to.
An infamous leaked report distributed by the Missouri Information Analysis Center last year listed Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, people who display bumper stickers, people who own gold, or even people who fly a U.S. flag and equated them with radical race hate groups and terrorists.
The 2009 Virginia Terrorism Threat Assessment, produced by the Virginia Fusion Center, smeared anyone who is “anti-government,” “anti-abortion,” as potential terrorists, equated people who enjoy rifle shooting practice and hunting with terrorists, and demonized the use of the Internet and websites like You Tube, Fark and Slashdot as terrorist tools. The use of “e-protests” is also talked about in the context of terrorism.
The document also discusses “special interest groups” who “incorporate a political message” in its section about domestic terrorists, which could be defined as any mildly political organization whatsoever.
These are just two of a plethora of similar police and federal government reports stretching back well over a decade that identify politically active Americans as domestic terrorists and a target of domestic authorities.
Unless Southers’ ambitions to head up the TSA are stopped, incidents of TSA thugs harassing libertarians and conservatives at airports, such as the case where a Ron Paul treasurer was interrogated for carrying cash and campaign information, will only become more prevalent.
Watch the clip below.


Welcome to the People's Republic of Amerika January 11, 2010

From http://www.prolibertate.us/index.php?blog=7&title=welcome_to_the_people_s_republic_of_amer_2010

Welcome to the People's Republic of Amerika January 11, 2010
Will Grigg’s Liberty Minute

January 11, 2010

On January 3, graduate student Haison Jiang dropped his girlfriend off at the Newark Airport. In the absence of a Transportation Security Administration guard, Jiang escorted his girlfriend to the boarding area.

The supposed security breach triggered a lockdown that left passengers stranded for up to six hours. Several days later Jiang was arrested at his home in Piscataway, interrogated for a few hours, then released. He has been charged with “defiant trespass” and faces a $500 fine.

New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg, displaying a disposition suitable to one of Mao’s Red Guards, is infuriated over the supposed leniency displayed toward Jiang, describing his act of escorting his girlfriend without government permission as “a terrible deed.” Significantly, the TSA guard whose absence permitted Jiang’s supposed offense is likely to escape any kind of professional censure.

Jiang came to the U.S. from Communist China in 2004. It’s doubtful his new home is significantly freer than the country he left.

Let us take back the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free.

12:23:21 pm . 01/11/10 . Will . 177 words . 9 views . Liberty Minutes Leave a comment

Scar's views

I disagree with many of the Bible interpretations on this thread.

Daniel 9:24-27

24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.

25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.



There is no moving the 70th week into the future unless you support the interpretation first proposed by Francisco Ribera, a Jesuit, as part of the Counter Reformation.

70 weeks, or 490 years, were determined on the Jewish people.

You will notice if you read the Book of Acts that the Apostles didn't preach the Gospel to anyone other than the Jews at first. When the Jews chose to stone Stephen rather than accept the Messiah, our Lord Jesus Christ raised up Paul and made him an Apostle to the Gentiles.

The stoning of Steven clearly marks the end of the 490 years. The last year of this prophecy wasn't moved into the future unless you deny the Bible is the literal Word of God.


Here's some history to verify this-

"At the Council of Trent, the Jesuits were commissioned by the Pope to develop a new interpretation of Scripture that would counteract the Protestant application of the Bible’s Antichrist prophecies to the Roman Catholic Church. Francisco Ribera (1537-1591), a brilliant Jesuit priest and doctor of theology from Spain, basically said, “Here am I, send me.” Like Martin Luther, Francisco Ribera also read by candlelight the prophecies about the Antichrist, the little horn, that man of sin, and the Beast. But because of his dedication and allegiance to the Pope, he came to conclusions vastly different from those of the Protestants. “Why, these prophecies don’t apply to the Catholic Church at all!” Ribera said. Then to whom do they apply? Ribera proclaimed, “To only one sinister man who will rise up at the end of time!” “Fantastic!” was the reply from Rome, and this viewpoint was quickly adopted as the official Roman Catholic position on the Antichrist.

“In 1590, Ribera published a commentary on the Revelation as a counter-interpretation to the prevailing view among Protestants which identified the Papacy with the Antichrist. Ribera applied all of Revelation but the earliest chapters to the end time rather than to the history of the Church. Antichrist would be a single evil person who would be received by the Jews and would rebuild Jerusalem.”5 “Ribera denied the Protestant Scriptural Antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2) as seated in the church of God—asserted by Augustine, Jerome, Luther and many reformers. He set on an infidel Antichrist, outside the church of God.”6 “The result of his work [Ribera’s] was a twisting and maligning of prophetic truth.”7

Following close behind Francisco Ribera was another brilliant Jesuit scholar, Cardinal Robert Bellarmine (1542-1621) of Rome. Between 1581 and 1593, Cardinal Bellarmine published his “Polemic Lectures Concerning the Disputed Points of the Christian Belief Against the Heretics of This Time.” In these lectures, he agreed with Ribera. “The futurist teachings of Ribera were further popularized by an Italian cardinal and the most renowned of all Jesuit controversialists. His writings claimed that Paul, Daniel, and John had nothing whatsoever to say about the Papal power. The futurists’ school won general acceptance among Catholics. They were taught that Antichrist was a single individual who would not rule until the very end of time.”8 Through the work of these two tricky Jesuit scholars, we might say that a brand new baby was born into the world. Protestant historians have given this baby a name—Jesuit Futurism. In fact, Francisco Ribera has been called the Father of Futurism."

Source- http://www.lmn.org/magazine/170/Jesuits.html



As far as the whole race issue, I don't think it's Biblical to preach racial separation.

Here's why-

Exodus 34:10-16

10 And he said, Behold, I make a covenant: before all thy people I will do marvels, such as have not been done in all the earth, nor in any nation: and all the people among which thou art shall see the work of the LORD: for it is a terrible thing that I will do with thee.

11 Observe thou that which I command thee this day: behold, I drive out before thee the Amorite, and the Canaanite, and the Hittite, and the Perizzite, and the Hivite, and the Jebusite.

12 Take heed to thyself, lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land whither thou goest, lest it be for a snare in the midst of thee:

13 But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves:

14 For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:

15 Lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, and they go a whoring after their gods, and do sacrifice unto their gods, and one call thee, and thou eat of his sacrifice;

16 And thou take of their daughters unto thy sons, and their daughters go a whoring after their gods, and make thy sons go a whoring after their gods.


Here we see God forbids the intermarriage with the other nations surrounding the Promised Land.

Did this command have anything to do with skin color, or everything to do with preventing false worship? I'll let the reader make this choice for themselves.


Deuteronomy 7:1-4

1 When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;

2 And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:

3 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.

4 For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.

Again, we see God forbidding the Israelites from intermarrying. Was it due to their skin color, or their being greater and mightier than Israel, or was the reason the prevention of false worship?


Exodus 12:48-49

48 And when a stranger shall sojourn with thee, and will keep the passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land: for no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof.

49 One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you.

Here we see that the stranger, or a member of another race, can become "as one that is born in the land" if he will agree to keep the Passover and circumcise himself and his sons.

Would God forbid these former strangers from marrying Israelities once they've become part of the nation?

Do you notice a theme here? Does God's problem with other races have anything to do with skin color, or does it seem to involve false worship?


Deuteronomy 7:7-8
7 The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:

8 But because the LORD loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the LORD brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.

and

Deuteronomy 9:4-6

4 Speak not thou in thine heart, after that the LORD thy God hath cast them out from before thee, saying, For my righteousness the LORD hath brought me in to possess this land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD doth drive them out from before thee.

5 Not for thy righteousness, or for the uprightness of thine heart, dost thou go to possess their land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee, and that he may perform the word which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

6 Understand therefore, that the LORD thy God giveth thee not this good land to possess it for thy righteousness; for thou art a stiffnecked people.

Were the Israelites God's Chosen People because they were genetically superior and more civilized than the other nations? I don't think this is an honest interpretation of this passage, but you might.


Acts 10:34-40

34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.

Maybe instead of using the term "Majority Savage Blacks", there could be a category that better reflects their religious beliefs.

I don't disagree that there are many ignorant people in this country who happen to be black. What I disagree with is that the reason for their ignorance has anything to do with skin color or genetics (as a group, not individually) and everything to do with poor parenting, educational systems in place, and brainwashing by the corporate controlled media.


Acts 17:24-28

24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;

25 Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;

26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:

28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.


We're all one blood, and we're all God's creation. Should we believe there's anything Biblical about racial miscegnation?

2 Corinthians 6:14
Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?

Don't you think God would have told us not to be unequally yoked with other races if this was an issue? It appears once again that worship is what God is concerned with.


I forgot to mention one thing. Intermarriage wouldn't result in a merging of the various nations if we followed Biblical conventions. If an Englishman marries a Kenyan, their children should be considered English according to the Bible. Obama would be considered Kenyan if his father was Kenyan. This is how it was done in ancient times. Your father determined your nationality, not your afro or lack thereof.

I understand God split us into different tongues and nations at Babel and I understand he doesn't want us to mix back into one nation united under a One World Order opposed to his rule and worship. I just think the miscegnation thing is taking the concept a bit too far.

We're told to be separate, but that applies to religion and not race. The elites definitely want us to do anything to come together under Lucifer, and they do support mixed marriages (for everyone but themselves!) for the same reason they oppose true Protestantism.

My nation is the United States of America. I don't oppose lawful immigration (only illegal) but I expect the laws to be followed by all where they don't conflict God's law. I expect the immigrants to be devoted to the US and not their former nation (if they're here to live and not just to study). I think English should be the official language and the only language taught in schools on a mandatory basis. I believe non-native speakers should be immersed in intensive English programs before they are taught anything else by our public schools.

-Scar