From http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/jesuits-vatican-islam-planned-false-messiah-religion/
Akhmet
You make two fundamental errors:
1: You confuse Satan’s Roman Catholicism with true Bible-believing Christianity.
2: You are under the misapprehension that Christians are under Mosaic law still.
To explicate the second point first, I will quote you from a letter that I received from Eric Jon Phelps, author of “Vatican Assassins”, who studied for five years at Lancaster Bible College:
“We are under no part of the Mosaic Law given to Israel including the 10 commandments (Romans 6:14; Galatians 2:16)
On the Day of Penetcost, a new dispensation began which maxims would be fully developed by the steward of the new dispensation, the apostle Paul.
The inspired writings of the apostle Paul are the foundation for the New Testament Church/Assembly composed of both Jews and Gentiles on an equal footing in one Body of Christ. This dispensation of grace (Ephesians 3:2) exists during this present evil age (Gal. 1:4).
This age began with the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1) and will end with the appearing of Christ for the dead and living bodies of his saints (I Thess. 4:13-18). This imminent appearing of Christ is before the 70th week of Daniel as the Body of Christ did not exist either in the first 483 years of Dan. 9:24-26, nor will it exist in the last seven years of that prophecy (Dan. 9:27). This age is a mystery entirely kept secret in the Old Testament but revealed to the Apostle Paul (Ephesians 3:4-8; Romans 16:25).
This is no paradox or rather a contradiction in scripture. We are merely rightly dividing the word of truth as we read the scripture literally withoug adding any private interpretation on our part.
Jesus was and is the steward for the re-established geopolical-international theocracy of the kingdom of David. That kingdom is called the “dispensation of the fulness of times” (Eph. 1:10). Paul is the steward for the “dispensation of the grace of God” during which the Church which is the Body of Christ now exists. There is no contradiction as two different dispensations with different rules can exist at the same time during the same age.”
To add to my statement of your error regarding what is & isn’t true Christianity: Rome did not create Christianity, it created a false Christianity, a counterfeit, just as it created Islam for people of colour. The same Islam that sold slaves to the European slave traders. Rome had also infiltrated Protestant Britain since the time of George III. Overwhelmingly, what you call Christianity is in fact Romanism.
Your copying & pasting one of (I presume) your own earlier blogs, gives the impression that I can make no peace with the Muslim people. That is not the case, we can come together to fight the Vatican-led Illuminati’s New World Order agenda, but not to mix faith. We then must seperate as our faiths are incompatible, with the Muslim faith being, as you have shown, entirely hostile to Christianity.
The anti-Christian Vatican & her puppets “Skull & Bones” Bush, “now openly Catholic future premiere Euro President” Blair, & his Masonic brother “unelected Prime Minister” Brown & their future successors are not Christians, they are - in Bush’s case - Knights of Eulogia, & - in the latter pair’s case - 33rd degree Freemasons. To quote Wikipedia “Strasbourg is the seat of several European institutions such as the Council of Europe with its European Court of Human Rights, its European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and its European Audiovisual Observatory, the Eurocorps as well as the European Parliament and the European Ombudsman of the European Union.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strasbourg
No coincidence that - as we see at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLIPSAS - Strasbourg’s place i high-level Masonry: “The Centre of Liaison and Information of Masonic Powers Signatories of Strasbourg Appeal (CLIPSAS) is an international organization of Masonic jurisdictions. These jurisdictions are considered irregular by the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) and most other Anglo-Saxon Grand Lodges because they accept women, or do not require Masons to have a belief in a Supreme Being. CLIPSAS was created in Strasbourg France on 22 January 1961, at the initiative of the Grand Orient de France and eleven Sovereign Masonic Powers. The Grand Lodges issued the Strasbourg appeal, with the goal to establish fraternal relations and the recognition of Absolute Liberty of Conscience.” The last statement referring to themselves & not you, you can be sure of that!
The EU was the creation of the Jesuits, & Jesuit priests created the Maastricht treaty. Do the homework.
In no way do I blame Muslims for 9/11, although Arab leaders & manipulators like Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, the House of Saud, the late Yasser Arafat - to name but a few - are all controlled by the Jesuits & Knights of Malta via Grand Orient Freemasonry. For crying out loud, the P.L.O. has had an office within the Vatican since 1994! See: http://troyspace.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/the-plos-vatican-office-opened-in-1994/
Without doubt, Jesuit-trained S.M.O.M. Knight of Malta 9/11 C-I-A director George J. Tenet & his many accomplices were acting on orders originating in Rome. Knight of Malta Giuliani also played a key role. This was an extension of the 20th Century postwar Operation Gladio Strategy of Tension. Ask Francesco Cossiga, he should know!
__________________________
troyspace
4.10.08 / 2am
Raoul,
Not entirely sure what you are inending to convey with your Nineveh statement.
From:
http://www.keyway.ca/htm2002/nineveh.htm
We have some Biblical context for Nineveh:
“Nineveh
by Wayne Blank
During the 1991 Gulf War against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, many ancient cities were shown on news maps. Among them was Nineveh.
Nineveh Nineveh was located on the eastern bank of the Tigris River in northeastern Mesopotamia (Iraq). It flourished from about 800 to 610 B.C. as the capital of the Assyrian empire (see Ancient Empires - Assyria). It is first mentioned in the Bible back in Genesis as being founded by Nimrod (Genesis 10:9-12).
During its time of power, the Assyrian empire conquered the northern Israelite kingdom of Israel, with their capital at Samaria, and transported them away into captivity. Unlike the southern Israelite kingdom of Judah, with their capital at Jerusalem Fact File, they never returned, and became known as the “Lost Ten Tribes” of Israel. The Assyrians themselves eventually were lost, although some identify their descendants as being in central Europe today.
Nineveh was the city that the reluctant prophet Jonah was sent to by God. Jonah did not want to go, so he ran away. However, after a famous adventure with a whale at sea he accepted what he was to do - get the people of Nineveh to repent of their evil. He went, and was successful. The photo shows the remains of the gate of ancient Nineveh where Jonah entered the city (Jonah 3:4).
Jonah however still was not happy because he did not very much like the Assyrians because of all of the harm that they had inflicted upon Israel. He was hoping that they would refuse to repent so that God would destroy them. He may well have been the only prophet in history that hoped that his ministry would fail!
Eventually, the Assyrian empire declined and fell. It was overtaken by the Persian (see Ancient Empires - Persia) and Babylonian (see King Nebuchadnezzar) empires who were themselves just then on the rise. Today, Nineveh is just a vast stretch of ancient ruins.
Fact Finder: How many people in Nineveh did Jonah convince to repent?
(a) 120 (b) 1,200 (c) 12,000 (d) 120,000
Jonah 4:11″
Was there something there that you were alluding too?
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Videos about Jordan Maxwell
_________________________
Part 2
_____________________
Part 3
_____________________________
Part 4
__________________________________
Part 5
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
"THE GODDESS", MARIOLATRY, THE NEW WORLD RELIGION
"THE GODDESS", MARIOLATRY, THE NEW WORLD RELIGION
No problem "bovvered", glad to see that I made myself clear.
I'm going to post this in two halves as I keep getting this 403/404 message when I post it complete. I have just tested this half to see if it "previews", which it does.
Okay, please bear with me, as I'm going to reply to your question, but also add some additional food for thought as to what the ingredients are that will form the New World Religion. So prepare for a bit of a tangent. In fact I have thought of some additional info that I may post later, but this shall suffice for now. There were other points that Fraser touched on, but I wasn't taking notes & so I'll discuss the main point that I was referring to & the one that I can recall for now.
Ivan Fraser brought out that now-fashionable New Age line about the "suppression of the Sacred Feminine" or some such phrasing. I don't recall his exact words but he was essentially presaging a general trend (no doubt informed via his proof-reading of that British Intelligence Aquarian Agent, David "Aqua" Icke) that has now snowballed to the extent that my ex-girlfriend (who is as Profane as the day is long) even trotted out the last time that I spoke with her a couple of years ago.
This "suppression of the goddess" business that has appeared over the past decade or so via authors pushing the whole Mary Magdalene business (Margaret Starbird, et al) & has reached some kind of critical mass seeding via Dan Brown's "Da Vinci Code" was helped along to large degree in conspiracy circles via the likes of Icke. It's complete counterintelligence-fed bunkum. The Roman Catholic religion should really be called "Mariolatry" (which it is sometimes by those of us outside of it that are aware of its true nature), due to it obsession with the Goddess figure (perhaps rivalled only by its John the Baptist fetish).
The Mary & baby Jesus of Catholicism is Isis & baby Horus & the obsession with idolatry of things like the image of Christ on the Cross is pure Paganism. None of this is Christian, nor is Easter & Christmas. The problem is that Rome has taken a patent out on the term Christianity while doing its best for the better part of two millennium trying to annihilate Christians & destroy Christianity.
The following is a reasonable overview of Rome's genocide against true Christians:
"The Catholic Inquisition and The Tools of Torture" (58 minutes)
Link
The theme song is a little dire, so try not to let that put you off it too much.
Anyway, without getting too off topic, we can say that if the New World Order is about anything other than complete control, it is about bringing in a New World Religion. That religion will almost certainly be hierarchical (like that of Rome & other False "Christian" "Churches" (or institutions, plain & simple) & have its roots (for the Higher Initiates) in the New Age, Theosophy, Masonry, Rosicrucianism & Roman Catholicism & I would suggest that it in its Outer Portico, its interface for the Profane it would even merge with Islam. Of course this would require a Third World War & the virtual traditional Islam, non-Catholic Christianity & Torah-based, non-Talmudic Judaism. But its no secret in many quarters that this has been planned for a very long time. It would be ruled by the Babylonian Brotherhood Vatican elite from Jerusalem & then Babylon rebuilt, following a false flag attack on Rome & on the Dome of the Rock & the Al Aqsa Mosque on Temple Mount, paving the way for the Third Temple (& an all out war against traditional Islam).
Mariolatry/Isis/Goddess-worship will be a major part pf this New World Religion I contend, as it has been for the past two millennia at least in Rome & before that in Egypt, Babylon, Sumer, etc...
So it is this "we must bring back the Sacred Feminine" petition for Goddess-worship that is in reality yet another devious Jesuit scheme to reinstall open Isis worship & get this whole problematic Mariolatry facade out into the open, now that they & the other agents of the Mother of All Harlots, Mystery Babylon, Rome have almost entirely succeeded in their hijacking of Christianity, particularly since World War Two & their almost total infiltration & emasculation of Protestant Churches either via their own direct covert agents or via Jesuit/Vatican-loyal high-level Freemasons like Biily Graham & pat Robertson & vast number of other lesser known assets.
The more that we fall for this Jesuitical campaign for "the Goddess," the more we are really campaigning for Mariolatry & a new Vatican World Religion - which you can bet your bottom dollar (as they say) will be no more liberating for m,an, woman nor beast than the present one, despite promise of the psy-ops. What's worse will be having Oprah Winfrey as the new High Priestess of the World!
We may laugh, but she's definitely being groomed for some similar role & does have her own rapidly-growing sect - designed by the Jesuits, of that you can be sure, for they invented the New Age, via Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, French Jesuit, philosopher and paleontologist, although the term itself predates him & has a wider, if more covert meaning.
Alberto Rivera's contention that Cardinal Bea had instructed him during his time with the Jesuits in the 1960's that the Vatican created Islam is, I feel, absolutely correct. There has been a campaign to debunk this material & Zagami argues that Cardinal Bea fed Rivera disinfo, but I disagree & think that Zagami has been fed disinfo in the past from Vatican sources on this being the case, as they try to implement damage limitation caused by Rivera's whistle blowing.
You can read a comic book rendition of Rivera's account here:
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/the_prophet.html
This was one of six such publications that utilise this format, which admittedly doesn't particularly bolster the intellectual credibility factor, but proved most effective in reaching a wider audience.
Rivera never recanted his story until his death, which has been alleged to have been assassination via poisoning. His wife has been interviewed a number of times & supports his story, as does Gerard Bouffard, claimed former Bishop of Guatemala, who of course has been written out of the Roman Catholic Institution's annals & attacked on the internet.
Eric Phelps posted me the following about Bouffard when I asked about him (my additions in parentheses):
A superb & fascinating two-hour interview (in two parts) with Bouffard from September 21, 2006 can be found at the following links:
http://arcticbeacon.com/audio/2006/2006-GCN/09-2006-GCN/0921-2006-GCN-Hr1.mp3
http://arcticbeacon.com/audio/2006/2006-GCN/09-2006-GCN/0921-2006-GCN-Hr2.mp3
No problem "bovvered", glad to see that I made myself clear.
I'm going to post this in two halves as I keep getting this 403/404 message when I post it complete. I have just tested this half to see if it "previews", which it does.
Okay, please bear with me, as I'm going to reply to your question, but also add some additional food for thought as to what the ingredients are that will form the New World Religion. So prepare for a bit of a tangent. In fact I have thought of some additional info that I may post later, but this shall suffice for now. There were other points that Fraser touched on, but I wasn't taking notes & so I'll discuss the main point that I was referring to & the one that I can recall for now.
Ivan Fraser brought out that now-fashionable New Age line about the "suppression of the Sacred Feminine" or some such phrasing. I don't recall his exact words but he was essentially presaging a general trend (no doubt informed via his proof-reading of that British Intelligence Aquarian Agent, David "Aqua" Icke) that has now snowballed to the extent that my ex-girlfriend (who is as Profane as the day is long) even trotted out the last time that I spoke with her a couple of years ago.
This "suppression of the goddess" business that has appeared over the past decade or so via authors pushing the whole Mary Magdalene business (Margaret Starbird, et al) & has reached some kind of critical mass seeding via Dan Brown's "Da Vinci Code" was helped along to large degree in conspiracy circles via the likes of Icke. It's complete counterintelligence-fed bunkum. The Roman Catholic religion should really be called "Mariolatry" (which it is sometimes by those of us outside of it that are aware of its true nature), due to it obsession with the Goddess figure (perhaps rivalled only by its John the Baptist fetish).
The Mary & baby Jesus of Catholicism is Isis & baby Horus & the obsession with idolatry of things like the image of Christ on the Cross is pure Paganism. None of this is Christian, nor is Easter & Christmas. The problem is that Rome has taken a patent out on the term Christianity while doing its best for the better part of two millennium trying to annihilate Christians & destroy Christianity.
The following is a reasonable overview of Rome's genocide against true Christians:
"The Catholic Inquisition and The Tools of Torture" (58 minutes)
Link
The theme song is a little dire, so try not to let that put you off it too much.
Anyway, without getting too off topic, we can say that if the New World Order is about anything other than complete control, it is about bringing in a New World Religion. That religion will almost certainly be hierarchical (like that of Rome & other False "Christian" "Churches" (or institutions, plain & simple) & have its roots (for the Higher Initiates) in the New Age, Theosophy, Masonry, Rosicrucianism & Roman Catholicism & I would suggest that it in its Outer Portico, its interface for the Profane it would even merge with Islam. Of course this would require a Third World War & the virtual traditional Islam, non-Catholic Christianity & Torah-based, non-Talmudic Judaism. But its no secret in many quarters that this has been planned for a very long time. It would be ruled by the Babylonian Brotherhood Vatican elite from Jerusalem & then Babylon rebuilt, following a false flag attack on Rome & on the Dome of the Rock & the Al Aqsa Mosque on Temple Mount, paving the way for the Third Temple (& an all out war against traditional Islam).
Mariolatry/Isis/Goddess-worship will be a major part pf this New World Religion I contend, as it has been for the past two millennia at least in Rome & before that in Egypt, Babylon, Sumer, etc...
So it is this "we must bring back the Sacred Feminine" petition for Goddess-worship that is in reality yet another devious Jesuit scheme to reinstall open Isis worship & get this whole problematic Mariolatry facade out into the open, now that they & the other agents of the Mother of All Harlots, Mystery Babylon, Rome have almost entirely succeeded in their hijacking of Christianity, particularly since World War Two & their almost total infiltration & emasculation of Protestant Churches either via their own direct covert agents or via Jesuit/Vatican-loyal high-level Freemasons like Biily Graham & pat Robertson & vast number of other lesser known assets.
The more that we fall for this Jesuitical campaign for "the Goddess," the more we are really campaigning for Mariolatry & a new Vatican World Religion - which you can bet your bottom dollar (as they say) will be no more liberating for m,an, woman nor beast than the present one, despite promise of the psy-ops. What's worse will be having Oprah Winfrey as the new High Priestess of the World!
We may laugh, but she's definitely being groomed for some similar role & does have her own rapidly-growing sect - designed by the Jesuits, of that you can be sure, for they invented the New Age, via Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, French Jesuit, philosopher and paleontologist, although the term itself predates him & has a wider, if more covert meaning.
Alberto Rivera's contention that Cardinal Bea had instructed him during his time with the Jesuits in the 1960's that the Vatican created Islam is, I feel, absolutely correct. There has been a campaign to debunk this material & Zagami argues that Cardinal Bea fed Rivera disinfo, but I disagree & think that Zagami has been fed disinfo in the past from Vatican sources on this being the case, as they try to implement damage limitation caused by Rivera's whistle blowing.
You can read a comic book rendition of Rivera's account here:
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/the_prophet.html
This was one of six such publications that utilise this format, which admittedly doesn't particularly bolster the intellectual credibility factor, but proved most effective in reaching a wider audience.
Rivera never recanted his story until his death, which has been alleged to have been assassination via poisoning. His wife has been interviewed a number of times & supports his story, as does Gerard Bouffard, claimed former Bishop of Guatemala, who of course has been written out of the Roman Catholic Institution's annals & attacked on the internet.
Eric Phelps posted me the following about Bouffard when I asked about him (my additions in parentheses):
| Quote: |
| Dear Troy, I know Gerard personally and visited him in Quebec. I saw his broken Bishop's ring, his KoC [Knights of Columbus] sword and he pointed out the RCC [Roman Catholic church] that hosted Masonic proceedings, one on a hill he pointed out to me when we were traveling on the road. He is the real deal and has been threatened never to go on Greg's [Greg Szymanski's Investigative Journal] show again. Sincerely in faith, Brother Eric |
A superb & fascinating two-hour interview (in two parts) with Bouffard from September 21, 2006 can be found at the following links:
http://arcticbeacon.com/audio/2006/2006-GCN/09-2006-GCN/0921-2006-GCN-Hr1.mp3
http://arcticbeacon.com/audio/2006/2006-GCN/09-2006-GCN/0921-2006-GCN-Hr2.mp3
Friday, November 21, 2008
LBJ
______________________________________________
LBJ benefited the most from the assassination of President Kennedy. We now know without doubt that the Zapruder film was forged, the autopsy photographs do not match the X-Rays, Witnesses at Bethesda and Dallas' Parkland hospital both say the back of JFK's head was blown out. Who had the Power to alter evidence like this and then seal it until we are all dead? Only LBJ and FBI Director Hoover. This is the darkest day in American History and the repercussions continue to today.
These lies won't go away until the average American when hearing the name of Lyndon Baines Johnson thinks, oh yes, the VP who killed Kennedy and hijacked our legal system, the government and the press to to disguise a banana republic coup into a murder mystery.
There's no mystery here: LBJ killed Kennedy with a simple scheme: Set up one of the players who was trying to kill Castro and use the organization to kill JFK. Oswald was just like he said, a patsy who was supposed to die on Nov 22. Jack Ruby had to kill him two days later.
A simple story that they aren't going to tell you the answer, they can't. The U.S. Government will forever be tarnished by this lie, along with the press and our corrupt legal system.
It was a simple murder. Stop believing the hogwash that we'll never know for sure.
IT Was LBJ.
Category: News & Politics
Pro Life Manna
From http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2008/11/not_bush_3_but.php
Not "Bush 3", But "Clinton 3"
- Hillary, Secretary of State
- Gregory B. Craig, President Bill Clinton's impeachment lawyer, now White House counsel (Obama's chief lawyer).
- Rahm Emanuel, former senior Clinton White House veteran, now Obama's White House chief of staff.
- Mona Sutphen, former special assistant to Bill Clinton's National-Security Adviser, Sandy Berger, now Obama deputy chief of staff. (You remember--and for Democrats who knew, have conveniently forgotten) Sandy Berger? He was the one who stole state secrets he wasn't allowed access to and then lied about it, then pleaded guilty and avoided jail time (naturally!) by paying a piddling $50,000 fine and was disallowed access to state secrets from his conviction in 2005 till, oh, look at that, 2008, this year? He'll probably get some kind of Obama-payback job very soon, even if not directly in the White House, in exchange for not writing his tell-all book about the whole affair.
- Ron Klain, top aide to Clinton's Vice President Al Gore, now Vice President-elect Joe Biden's chief of staff.
- Eric Holder, "former deputy attorney general from 1997 to the end of President Bill Clinton's administration", likely Obama attorney general.
- And then there's "one of President-elect Barack Obama's closest foreign-policy advisers", Susan Rice:
"Spencer Ackerman of the left-liberal Washington Independent profiles Susan Rice, an assistant secretary of state in the Clinton administration...
'Her record was not without its blemishes. According to human-rights expert Samantha Power's study of the U.S. reaction to genocide, "A Problem From Hell," Rice didn't distinguish herself in the Clinton administration's lax response to the Rwandan genocide of 1994. As an Africa expert on the NSC, she shocked an interagency conference call by interjecting domestic politics into the discussion of the administration's policy options.
"Over at the left-liberal American Prospect, Adam Serwer comments: 'Obviously not Dr. Rice's proudest moment, but I think it speaks well of her that she is able to learn from her mistakes.'""If we use the word 'genocide,' " Rice allegedly asked her colleagues, "and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on the November [congressional] election?" . . .
'About Rwanda, Rice later told Power, "I swore to myself that if I ever faced such a crisis again, I would come down on the side of dramatic action, going down in flames if that was required," which might explain Rice's passion about Darfur.
___________________
PRO-CHOICE ARGUMENT: Part III
"Prolifers don't care about women, and they don't care about babies once they're born.
"
PRO-LIFE ANSWER:
It is "abortion providers" who do not provide support for women choosing anything but abortion.
When you hear abortion providers talk about the help they offer women, ask them: "If a fifteen-year-old girl comes into your clinic with no money, no one to help her, no home to go to, and no desire to have an abortion, what services does your facility provide for her?" The answer is always the same---none. Abortion advocates don't offer help. They offer abortion, and then only to those who can pay their price.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Covert Ups
From http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/covert_activities_and_coverups.htm
COVERT ACTIVITIES AND COVER-UPS
MOST PEOPLE ARE NOT AWARE OF
by John Gunter
JUST A NOTE BEFORE YOU READ. SOME OF THIS MATERIAL MAY BE HARD TO SWALLOW. THAT'S OK. I ENCOURAGE YOU TO TO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. DON'T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT. INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE TO THOSE WHO SEEK FOR IT. WE ALL HAVE A TENDENCY TO WANT TO LIVE IN OUR OWN LITTLE SHELL, A KIND OF FANTASY WORLD, AND SOMETIMES TRUTH HURTS.
The information in this document, you may use to post anywhere you wish. My request is that you do not alter the contents, but provide it as is. I know there are professional people who would cut and paste at will to make me say something I didn't. I suppose I am not a "public" figure, so at this time, it won't pose as much of a threat. Also, Please don't post it somewhere it does not belong, like under computer programming or something which is not even close to relating to this. Thank You!!!!!
Just to let you know what I am ABSOLUTELY NOT!!! I am not anti-government at all. I am not anti American nor anti-American government. I pay my taxes. I don't agree with how all my tax money is being spent, but I still pay them.. not out of fear, but out of true reverence for the just purpose and design of government. Some of this material speaks of certain governmental agencies. For the most part, names have been left off except for a couple of places. I in no way encourage flat-out rebellion against government. I do feel a need, however, to expose evil cover-ups. I know for a fact, for example, that not every person working for the CIA is evil. The same is true for the military, FBI, IRS, and any other Federal or State Agency. It can be an honor to work for government if you are honest, sincere, and desire to truly serve people. I personally have worked for the government before, and some of the nicest people I've met worked there as well.
Just a bit of info on surveillance:
Maybe you know this already, but:
1. Most Televisions from early '90s to present are equipped with 2 way communication capabilities. The cable TV connection in the wall is a standard coax computer networking cable and provides a way for others to see into your home even though you are unaware of it. see also: Black Boxes and Marble Memorials, Cable T. V. Snooping
2. Post mid - '80 automobiles are designed with a computer chip which can be controlled remotely via satellite. If desired, individual as well as massive automobile shutdown in a city could be accomplished. (Your vin # is recorded and connected with your name) See Clinton's secret war games
3. The satellites which are called low earth orbiting satellites can read a postage stamp on a tennis court.
4. The computer system called the B.E.A.S.T.S. in Brussels, Belgium records ATM and debit card transactions within 57 seconds. It is known what you bought and where you bought it. B.E.A.S.T.S. stands for Brussels Electronic Accounting Surveillance Terminal Systems. It is a Cray Super Computer. See The Beast of the Apocalypse: 666
5. Anything greater than a $5 dollar bill with a date of 1992 or above has a metallic strip running through it. You can see this strip if you hold it up to the light. The technology is in place for someone with the correct equipment to drive by your home with a special scanner and know approximately how much money you have in your home. It was placed there under a partial truth as a way to track drug money, but in reality serves other purposes, since all nations of the world have the same strip in them. (The computers don't care what country or what picture is on the money, they still register the same numbers)
6. The Black helicopters which fly overhead are surveillance helicopters which use infra-red scanning and can see through your house. They are illegal helicopters according to US law, for legal helicopters MUST have positively marked identification on the bottom of them. These do not. BLACK HELICOPTERS EXIST
7. Polar icecaps have been tampered with by elitists in this world and it has caused tremendous weather shifts world- wide. See HAARP Index: Hard Truth / Wake Up America
8. Since the 1960's, lasers have been used to create electro- magnetic fields in the atmosphere in order to control weather by pulling weather fronts to desired locations. HAARP Index: Hard Truth / Wake Up America
9. In 1992, it was displayed on the agenda of the Eco-earth summit meeting in RIO DE JANEIRO by the "elite" wealthy, world government officials that the present attempts to cut the world population was not sufficient... That the Earth's population MUST be cut to 2 billion by the year 2000 at WHATEVER THE COST. Have you ever wondered about some of these new diseases that all of a sudden spring up out of nowhere???? Well, Why not just wipe out an entire continent? How about Africa?? The cruelty of these wicked, filthy people knows no bounds!!! The Timeline of Population Control
10. As soon as they ("the elite") have a green light, a world- wide economic crash is planned in order to force a one world government. Destruction of the Trade Centers: Occult Symbolism Indicates Enemies Within Our Own Government
11. It has been developed and is ready to be implemented: a positive identification mark (a computer chip about the size of a grain of rice) to be inserted into every man, woman and child on the planet. This will eventually replace debit and credit cards. We are being prepared slowly to this by the introduction of microchips in pets as well as prisoners and babies (so they can't be lost). This would make every man, woman, and child track-able by satellite. see also: THE SKINCODE
Just some information for you: 1 1/2 million dollars was spent by a medical center on the east coast which was part of this United Nations project with unlimited funding to determine where on the body this microchip was to be implanted. It just so happened that the microchip is recharged by a lithium battery. Lithium is sensitive to heat change. This is what causes the recharging to occur. After this research, they discovered that which mothers new all along ... that temperature rises and drops the most on the back of the hand, and on the forehead. As a result, the decision was made to implant this coming microchip either on the back of the hand or on the fore- head. The right hand was chosen because most people are right handed. Food for thought is Revelation 13 in the Bible. Maybe the Bible was right after all.
12 This happens to be ONE of their best and most covered up secrets:
Since the 1950's, the CIA/DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) FBI, KGB, and other World organizations have taken abused children and placed them into the most sophisticated mind control program thought possible whereby personalities were split through carefully planned near-death torture until literal slaves were created with personalities which could be used for drug-running, prostitution, espionage, assassinations, political-favors to name a few. Hundreds of thousands of people in US alone are "asleep" in society waiting to be accessed by these WICKED, FILTHY human beings! They live in all walks of life: doctors, lawyers, computer programmers, nurses, governmental positions to name a few. The Illuminati: How The Cults Program People, by Svali: Index
Many of you reading this have heard of Multiple Personalities, or Multiple personality disorder. The sick cover-up is that almost ALL of those with this problem were planned deviously by these "elitists" in the world. You may ask, "How come this information doesn't get out?" The answer is because these same people control almost all of the publishing companies. They control almost ALL major newspapers as well as Banks as well as News stations.
As your own personal project, find out some of the organizations which the major news anchormen belong to and then discover who the leaders of these organizations are, and you will find out why these people don't talk.... their bosses won't let them!!! Like the one man who ALMOST succeeded in getting the Federal Reserve System. audited.... OOPS!! that flight 007 over USSR which he was on just happened to "look like" a fighter plane ... Too bad... it got shot down...just a coincidence, of course.
13. True virtual reality (not the video games or much of the soft coated "virtual reality" words used to dull your senses to when the real stuff hits the market) is INSTANT hypnotism and is planned to put the masses of the people under total mind control of the ruling elite of the world. in the same exact way that those who were tortured into multiple personalities above are under total mind control.
You may ask: What can we do??? Personally, there is only one thing for me to suggest: Start reading the Bible with an open mind. These things were written about 2000 years ago. Before you are swept away in the flood, place the life vest on so you can float above it all!! If you do this, you will not be harmed by this coming storm over our planet.
In Love,
John Gunter
Promise Keepers, Kenneth Hagan and Freemasonry
From http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/kenneth_hagan33.htm
http://www.cephasministry.com/famous.html
Promise Keepers, Kenneth Hagan and Freemasonry
Promise Keepers has taken pagan worship one step further. The first exposure of P.K. that I read documented that fact that the Promise Keepers distributed a book filled with sexual imagery of a very perverted sort. This article revolves around the pagan worship of the phallus (male reproductive organ). The story starts in July 1997 when the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree of Freemasonry in it's official publication called 'The Scottish Rite Journal' made a call to raise funds to restore the Masonic obelisk in Washington D.C. and also placed it on the cover of the magazine. This vile structure has been worshipped by pagans for centuries and it represents the phallus which is also associated with sun and serpent worship. It was designed by Freemasons, named after a Freemason and the cornerstone laid in Masonic ritual. Therefore it is a sexual, pagan, satanic, Masonic idol that Christians should identify and avoid. But these facts have been ignored and Christians are being deceived about the nature of this idol. Kenneth Hagan followed the Masonic lodge by placing the obelisk on his magazine cover the very next month! I do not believe that this is a coincidence and that a man such as Hagan who is well over 50 years older then me (he just turned 80) and was in Ministry well before I was even born and who has established International Bible colleges would be ignorant of the true nature of the obelisk.
This is a photo taken from the 'Scottish Rite Journal' published by the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree of Freemasonry.
The very next month in July 1997, Kenneth Hagan followed after the Mason's example by placing the Masonic obelisk on the cover of his magazine. The article about the obelisk in the Masonic magazine mentioned that at the Grand Masters Conference held in Tulsa, Oklahoma (the headquarters for both 33rd degree Freemasons Oral Roberts and Kenneth Hagan) a call was made to Grand Lodges to raise money to restore the world's tallest masonry structure. Were Hagan and Roberts present at this meeting? Anyone willing to come forward? Another significant clue is the key word 'illuminate' used by the Word of Faith magazine to describe the cover. The Illuminati has been associated with the obelisk a long time before. See the image below, published in 1982, for the obelisk-illuminati connection.
Promise Keepers, Kenneth Hagan and Freemasonry
See also: Dirty Watchtower Secrets Kenneth Copeland: "God Is Both Male & Female" http://web.archive.org/web/20070813223922/http://jewsformorality.org/adl.htm |
Sunday, November 02, 2008
A Different View of Barack Obama from a Sister
Part 1
______________________
Part 2
_______________________________
Part 3
____________________________
Part 4
______________________
Part 2
_______________________________
Part 3
____________________________
Part 4
Friday, October 31, 2008
Incest and abortion
From This is the link.
Pro-Choice Argument: Part 7
"What about a woman who is pregnant due to rape or incest?"
PRO-LIFE ANSWER:
All that is true of children conceived in rape is true of those conceived in incest.
Incest is a horrible crime. Offenders should be punished, and young girls should be carefully protected from further abuse. Decisive personal and legal intervention should be taken to remove a girl from the presence of a relative who has sexually abused her. The abuser--not the girl or her child--is the problem. Intervention, protection, and ongoing personal help for the girl---not the death of an innocent child--is the solution. Despite popular beliefs, fetal deformity is rare in such cases. Even if the child has handicaps, however, he still deserves to live.
_____________________
Vote Third Party
______________
____________
Pro-Choice Argument: Part 7
"What about a woman who is pregnant due to rape or incest?"
PRO-LIFE ANSWER:
All that is true of children conceived in rape is true of those conceived in incest.
Incest is a horrible crime. Offenders should be punished, and young girls should be carefully protected from further abuse. Decisive personal and legal intervention should be taken to remove a girl from the presence of a relative who has sexually abused her. The abuser--not the girl or her child--is the problem. Intervention, protection, and ongoing personal help for the girl---not the death of an innocent child--is the solution. Despite popular beliefs, fetal deformity is rare in such cases. Even if the child has handicaps, however, he still deserves to live.
_____________________
Vote Third Party
______________
____________
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Other Information
From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=5682
http://www.youtube.com/w/Illuminati?v=l7bs...arch=Illuminati (Illuminati-has some fake Sci-Fi Channel UFO footage at Twin Towers of WTC)
http://www.youtube.com/w/Illuminati-versio...arch=Illuminati (Illuminati Version 1.2)
This film (there are two versions and I've included both-the first one has fake UFO footage near the WTC from a Sci/Fi channel promo which some people thought was real) about the Jesuits' Illuminati and NWO is right on.
This film correctly shows that William Greer the Secret Service limo driver fired the kill shot from point blank range with a specialized gun which killed President John F. Kennedy.
You will see 3 photos of the Masonic doubled-headed phoenix and the third one on the right shows the Jesuits' I.N.R.I. below it.
Here's is a photo of that picture http://azazel.smugmug.com/gallery/470865/1/54381404/Large
http://azazel.smugmug.com/ (Global Alliance Militia: exposing the darkness)
[There is a great deal of truthful info here.]
http://azazel.smugmug.com/gallery/470857 (Pledge Allegiance gallery of Nazi salutes , Satanic Hand signals, Masonic hand gestures and secret handshakes. There are lots of incriminating photos here catching the Jesuits' tools-their Vatican and Roman Catholic Institution, Illuminati and Masonic Craft and other secret societies in the act. See this one of Jesuit-trained and CFR master and commander of the Order's American Intelligence Community Francis Cardinal Spellman in a Masonic handshake with and Freemason Antichrist Pope John XIII. http://azazel.smugmug.com/gallery/470857/1/55330076/Small
I think these photos are taken from Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Texe Marrs new book "Codex Magica" some of Marrs' information is truthful and useful but he intentionally blames Jews in general instead of the chief Jesuit conspirators. Marrs does expose the Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists who are merely the tools of the "Company of Zion" and Knights of the Virgin Mary [Semiramis]-the Jesuits but he does not expose the Jesuits and the Black Pope. Indeed, there are certain Masonic Kabbalist Jews of the Papal Court who are in on the White Gentile Jesuit World Conspiracy who are used to make all Jewish people a scapegoat. I found an example on the New Orleans Chabad Lubavitcher webpage that shows these Masonic Kabbalist Zionist Jews serve the Jesuit Order it's not the other way around as Coadjutor Texe Marrs describes it.
http://www.chabadneworleans.com/templates/...html?AID=221664
Excerpt: "The soon to built Rohr Chabad Jewish Student Center, serving Tulane, Loyola and UNO universities"
http://www.jewishlouisiana.com/templates/p...1295&iid=650723
[Lubavitcher Kabbalist Jews with the son of a rabbi, the visible head of Homeland/Vaterland meaning Fatherland Security Michael Chertoff].
http://www.chabadneworleans.com/templates/...html?AID=341776 [same photos with better descriptions]
This film is titled "American Dollar"
http://www.youtube.com/w/illuminati-the-al...arch=Illuminati
You see blatant Masonic greetings and gestures- (notice the pats on the back and the pat on the back of the head and how close his head is to the man's ear which is repeated to show you that was Masonic language and 33rd Degree Scottish/Jesuit Rite Freemason Trent Lott is close by the whole time watching) made by Luciferian Skull and Bonesman Emperor George W. Bush.
The next thing I noticed was the Masonic (the film says Illuminist) handshake between 32nd Degree Shriner Freemason and honorary Knight of Malta Ronald Wilson Reagan and his Masonic brother Mikhail Gorbechev which is further evidence that the Cold War was a Jesuit hoax and farce and the Cold War "ended" on the Order's terms with its high-level Masons. What a staged show it all was! The Global Jesuit Theater continues. All of the players are actors following a script and the high-level Jesuits and their Freemasons are the backstage crew, the White Pope is the visible pseudo- director but the Black Pope is the real director of the whole show and at the final curtain the risen Satanic Pope, the beast will enter center stage. We know it will end on the terms of the risen Son of God.
"And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:" (2 Thess. 2:8).
Brother Nicholas N. Rivera
____________
I agree with 2TUFF! David Icke deliberately misdirects by pointing to the Bilderberg Group which was created by high level Freemason Rettiger which is merely a strand of the large elaborate web of Jesuit geopolitical control. I would not say that Icke is a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor to the degree of someone like Dan Brown whose next book is entitled "The Solomon Key" about Freemasonry. The Company is using Brown to misdirect people into believing in a Jewish World Conspiracy. http://solomon.dailygrail.com/
All Jews through Brown's book could be implicated in the made-up Jewish conspiracy which is based on a huge whopping lie just as Angels and Demons (Illuminati and Vatican are enemies according to Brown) and The Da Vinci Code (a fictional bloodline that traces back to Christ and the liar Brown has the audacity to even consider the ridiculous idea that Christ had children by Mary Magdalene) in general instead of just the Masonic Jewish Sionists/Zionists who are players in the very real ultimate world conspiracy of which the Jesuits are at the top commanding all Freemasonry and the Order of the Illuminati which was created by the Jesuits to appear secular but it ultimately serves the religious power-the Antichrist Papacy contrary to Temporal Coadjutor Brown's prequel to the Da Vinci Code "Angels and Demons". Brown deliberately portrays the Jesuits' Illuminati brotherhood as the enemy of the Roman Catholic Church and the Jesuits' Vatican whose ultimate task is to blow up the Vatican using antimatter when they are actually in league and both are swords of the Black Pope just as in Unam Sanctam, a Papal bull I wonder if Brown is a Freemason.
Brother Nicholas N. Rivera
All Jews through Brown's book could be implicated in the made-up Jewish conspiracy which is based on a huge whopping lie just as Angels and Demons (Illuminati and Vatican are enemies according to Brown) and The Da Vinci Code (a fictional bloodline that traces back to Christ and the liar Brown has the audacity to even consider the ridiculous idea that Christ had children by Mary Magdalene) in general instead of just the Masonic Jewish Sionists/Zionists who are players in the very real ultimate world conspiracy of which the Jesuits are at the top commanding all Freemasonry and the Order of the Illuminati which was created by the Jesuits to appear secular but it ultimately serves the religious power-the Antichrist Papacy contrary to Temporal Coadjutor Brown's prequel to the Da Vinci Code "Angels and Demons". Brown deliberately portrays the Jesuits' Illuminati brotherhood as the enemy of the Roman Catholic Church and the Jesuits' Vatican whose ultimate task is to blow up the Vatican using antimatter when they are actually in league and both are swords of the Black Pope just as in Unam Sanctam, a Papal bull I wonder if Brown is a Freemason.
Brother Nicholas N. Rivera
___________
_______
The Talmud was not written by Jesuits. I HOPE that I said that the Rome, via their court Jews, was behind the writing of the Talmud which includes the completion of that 63-volume Babylonian Talmud in the Sixth century. I have said that the Jesuits are masters of the Talmud and the similiarity between that wicked compendium of Messiah-hating heresy and the Vatican's Anti-christ Canon Law is most striking. (The Talmud and Canon law refers to those peoples outside of their work-salvation cults as "animals.")
So yes, the Talmud predates the Jesuits by almost 1000 years; but the Order, which now includes select Jews, some of them being Orthodox Jews---like the chief Rabbis of Rome and Jerusalem---are most assuredly Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors using the Talumd to create worldwide anti-Jewish fury for the purpose of driving all Jews back to Israel for their attempted final annhilation. At that time the Lord Jesus Christ will intervene, save his repentant nation, smash the invading Gentile nations and then establish his millennial kingdom on earth.
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
So yes, the Talmud predates the Jesuits by almost 1000 years; but the Order, which now includes select Jews, some of them being Orthodox Jews---like the chief Rabbis of Rome and Jerusalem---are most assuredly Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors using the Talumd to create worldwide anti-Jewish fury for the purpose of driving all Jews back to Israel for their attempted final annhilation. At that time the Lord Jesus Christ will intervene, save his repentant nation, smash the invading Gentile nations and then establish his millennial kingdom on earth.
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
__________
Malachi Martin was a Jesuit until the day he died. Therefore he never
exposed the Order's complete control over the Vatican, and thus the Order
being the source for the Satanism now being practiced inside Vatican walls.
Brother Eric
exposed the Order's complete control over the Vatican, and thus the Order
being the source for the Satanism now being practiced inside Vatican walls.
Brother Eric
___________
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=3580812 (The New Age Movement)
_______
Hey Eric,
How are you, sir? It's been a long time since we communicated, and I really hope you are doing well. How is married life treating you?
All is well; Danita and the boys are doing great.
When I last heard from you, things seemed to be going very well. I seem to recall our mutual friend, Keith Hansen (Vyzygoth) telling me that you are/were working on VA III? By all means, let me know.
Indeed. VAIII is now over 1300 pages and should be finished in about a month. It is full of great quotes and pictures. The simplistic like myself need good pictures to hold our attention!
I have an important question. I've recently come across the teachings of a woman named Barbara Aho. Never heard of her before, but on her website www.watch-unto-prayer.org she asserts that Ignatius Loyola was a "Marrano Jew." The source she lists does not seem well researched. The information sounds suspicious (as does much of the info. on her website) but I thought you would probably know better than anyone. Can you let me know if you agree/disagree when you are able?
Totally disagree. I have dealt with this lie in the past as the Order seems to be making a turn in tactics so as to blame the Jews as being responsible for the diabolical history of the Order. Texe Marrs is advocating the same. Loyola was a Gentile Spanish nobleman from a noble family that survived Ferdinand and Isabellla's expulsion of Spain's Jews in 1492. Although Laynez was a Jew, that discovery led to the passing of the 1593 statute in the Constitutions that forbade a Jew to be in the Order. Ex-Jesuit E. Boyd Barrett stated in his The Jesuit Enigma that no Jew could ever be in the Order as of 1927. But the statute was removed in 1946 after many were likening the Order to the SS which forbade a Jew from becoming a member.
FYI: Last time, I spoke to you about working on Megiddo III, which is intended to focus on "Mystery Babylon the Great" -- but the work was postponed as another project took priority.
By the way, Megiddo II was better and much more powerful than Megiddo I because you stuck to the AV1611 for your quotations. Well done and lots of invaluable info!
I don't know if you've seen or heard about our new documentary, "Secret Mysteries of America's Beginnings," but if not, I'll be happy to send you a copy -- if you'd like to see it.
I'd love to see it.
You'll see that our production quality is improving (thank the Lord!) and should help us in producing a powerful presentation for M3. I am still planning to ask you for another interview when the time comes (with our new equipment, we get much better sound and picture) but this is all yet a year or so away, as the Lord leads us.
Sounds good!
Also, to give you a heads-up -- the reason I am inquiring about information I found from Barbara Aho, is because this woman has launched an attack against our new documentary. She suggests that because we speak about Sir Francis Bacon, we are supposedly planning to discredit the King James Bible -- even though we make no mention of the KJV in the film. While I am aware of the long standing "theory" that Bacon was involved in the KJV translation, my own research has revealed that no historical evidence exists to support such a claim.
Correct. Some of the greatest advocates of this lie are the masons, as the agnostic Bacon was one of them. Those learned and godly 47 men would never have allowed Bacon to touch one word of their work, and if so, that dedication to King James would never have been written. King James authorized the work, but never touched it.
In fact, I spoke directly to a man (his name is Peter Dawkins, a new ager) who is believed to be the leading expert on Bacon himself, and he more than anyone convinced me that Francis Bacon did not translate or interpret the KJV.
Wonderful! Great find!
I believe the KJV to be the best English translation we have -- especially now that I have studied the issue at greater length.
Very good. That will bring a return to a historic Reformed faith and a Reformation-based society---one that we once had about 60 years ago.
Furthermore, Barbara Aho has accused us of "not telling" our audience that America was actually founded as a "Masonic-Jewish" empire, created for the purpose of one day returning the Jews to Zion.
What nonsense. John Daniel proceeds down this same slippery slope. This tale avoids the history of the Reformation and the resultant cultures it produced, especially New England. I believe it is mere Jesuit rhetoric so as to destroy all patriotism among true Bible believing people thus paving the way for the Black Pope's NWO.
Along this line of thinking, she also teaches that "Mystery Babylon" is Jewish rather than Catholic.
The same holds true for Texe Marrs. That great city of Revelation 17:18 is, get this, not Rome but Jerusalem! Obviously this woman is another Jesuitess Coadjutor.
Incredible. Unfortunately, she's getting too much time on the radio.
Of course! Alex Jones, Texe Marrs, Daryl Bradford Smith and Michael Collins Piper are some of the more notable Jew bashers refusing to distinguish between the devil's Pope-serving Masonic Jewish Zionists and the Lord's beloved Hebrew/Jewish/Israelitic people yet to inherit the promises made to the fathers.
Again, I hope you are well, Eric. Please write back when you are able.
Good to hear from you Chris and thanks for the facts on Bacon. They are needed at this time.
God bless,
Chris
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
How are you, sir? It's been a long time since we communicated, and I really hope you are doing well. How is married life treating you?
All is well; Danita and the boys are doing great.
When I last heard from you, things seemed to be going very well. I seem to recall our mutual friend, Keith Hansen (Vyzygoth) telling me that you are/were working on VA III? By all means, let me know.
Indeed. VAIII is now over 1300 pages and should be finished in about a month. It is full of great quotes and pictures. The simplistic like myself need good pictures to hold our attention!
I have an important question. I've recently come across the teachings of a woman named Barbara Aho. Never heard of her before, but on her website www.watch-unto-prayer.org she asserts that Ignatius Loyola was a "Marrano Jew." The source she lists does not seem well researched. The information sounds suspicious (as does much of the info. on her website) but I thought you would probably know better than anyone. Can you let me know if you agree/disagree when you are able?
Totally disagree. I have dealt with this lie in the past as the Order seems to be making a turn in tactics so as to blame the Jews as being responsible for the diabolical history of the Order. Texe Marrs is advocating the same. Loyola was a Gentile Spanish nobleman from a noble family that survived Ferdinand and Isabellla's expulsion of Spain's Jews in 1492. Although Laynez was a Jew, that discovery led to the passing of the 1593 statute in the Constitutions that forbade a Jew to be in the Order. Ex-Jesuit E. Boyd Barrett stated in his The Jesuit Enigma that no Jew could ever be in the Order as of 1927. But the statute was removed in 1946 after many were likening the Order to the SS which forbade a Jew from becoming a member.
FYI: Last time, I spoke to you about working on Megiddo III, which is intended to focus on "Mystery Babylon the Great" -- but the work was postponed as another project took priority.
By the way, Megiddo II was better and much more powerful than Megiddo I because you stuck to the AV1611 for your quotations. Well done and lots of invaluable info!
I don't know if you've seen or heard about our new documentary, "Secret Mysteries of America's Beginnings," but if not, I'll be happy to send you a copy -- if you'd like to see it.
I'd love to see it.
You'll see that our production quality is improving (thank the Lord!) and should help us in producing a powerful presentation for M3. I am still planning to ask you for another interview when the time comes (with our new equipment, we get much better sound and picture) but this is all yet a year or so away, as the Lord leads us.
Sounds good!
Also, to give you a heads-up -- the reason I am inquiring about information I found from Barbara Aho, is because this woman has launched an attack against our new documentary. She suggests that because we speak about Sir Francis Bacon, we are supposedly planning to discredit the King James Bible -- even though we make no mention of the KJV in the film. While I am aware of the long standing "theory" that Bacon was involved in the KJV translation, my own research has revealed that no historical evidence exists to support such a claim.
Correct. Some of the greatest advocates of this lie are the masons, as the agnostic Bacon was one of them. Those learned and godly 47 men would never have allowed Bacon to touch one word of their work, and if so, that dedication to King James would never have been written. King James authorized the work, but never touched it.
In fact, I spoke directly to a man (his name is Peter Dawkins, a new ager) who is believed to be the leading expert on Bacon himself, and he more than anyone convinced me that Francis Bacon did not translate or interpret the KJV.
Wonderful! Great find!
I believe the KJV to be the best English translation we have -- especially now that I have studied the issue at greater length.
Very good. That will bring a return to a historic Reformed faith and a Reformation-based society---one that we once had about 60 years ago.
Furthermore, Barbara Aho has accused us of "not telling" our audience that America was actually founded as a "Masonic-Jewish" empire, created for the purpose of one day returning the Jews to Zion.
What nonsense. John Daniel proceeds down this same slippery slope. This tale avoids the history of the Reformation and the resultant cultures it produced, especially New England. I believe it is mere Jesuit rhetoric so as to destroy all patriotism among true Bible believing people thus paving the way for the Black Pope's NWO.
Along this line of thinking, she also teaches that "Mystery Babylon" is Jewish rather than Catholic.
The same holds true for Texe Marrs. That great city of Revelation 17:18 is, get this, not Rome but Jerusalem! Obviously this woman is another Jesuitess Coadjutor.
Incredible. Unfortunately, she's getting too much time on the radio.
Of course! Alex Jones, Texe Marrs, Daryl Bradford Smith and Michael Collins Piper are some of the more notable Jew bashers refusing to distinguish between the devil's Pope-serving Masonic Jewish Zionists and the Lord's beloved Hebrew/Jewish/Israelitic people yet to inherit the promises made to the fathers.
Again, I hope you are well, Eric. Please write back when you are able.
Good to hear from you Chris and thanks for the facts on Bacon. They are needed at this time.
God bless,
Chris
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
A Response to a person about Opus Dei
From http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=121492
TruthSeeker24
A Response.
Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:11
72.218.92.240
Aho is the same one saying that 33rd Degree Freemason Henry Ford is a great source. Barbara Aho supports the palgarized Proctocols of the Elders of Zion (which promotes anti-Semitism). That's a lie. There is no such thing as a modern Pierre de Sion as Aho lies about. The ancient Peirre de Sion died in the Middle Ages. A Nazi Plantard created a fake Pierre de sion in the 20th century. Marrano Jewish people existed, yes. Also, this doesn't omit the wicked history of the Vatican from the slave trade, the Inquistion, the assaults against the Waldensian, WWII, the Ecumencial Movement, and other incidents. I will research if the Opus Dei founder was really Jewish since Aho made that accusation before. I don't trust Aho at all since she uses false sources before. Even if that is the case, the Vatican/Jesuit leaders control Opus Dei. Gentile Javier EchevarrÃa RodrÃguez is the hed of Opus Dei today. Also, the Vatican is a wicked organization because its doctrines are nonewhere near Biblical. Also, Samuel Alito and Nancy Pelosi are Roman Catholics. Alito is apart of the K of C and notes find that Alito might be of the Opus Dei as well. Opus Dei is a wicked organization. The K of C were created by Gentile Roman Catholics. Not to mention that the Constantian Order, the K of C, the Pilgrim Society, the Jesuits, etc. ought to be exposed as well.
There is no evidence that Alito is a cypto Jew at all. There is no evidence that Pelosi has total Jewish ancestry at all (possibly only on her mother side). Most Supreme Court Justices are Catholics. They aren't typical Roman Catholics. They are strict Roman Catholics who submit themselves to the Papacy. I wonder why you legitimately criticize evil Zionists, but refuse to expose the Vatican. I will expose both. The Vatican was wicked since its formation. Funny you quote from Barbara Aho's literature when Aho follows the Jesuit invention of the pre-trib rapture and supports the corrupt triqueta-logo having NKJV Bible.
By Timothy (TruthSeeker24)
_________________
Links to back up what I say:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priory_of_Sion
http://www.davinci-the-movie.com/priory-of-sion-3.html
http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/nkjv_one_world_church.html
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/protocols.html
http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/whatabout-nkjv.html
http://jesus-is-lord.com/nkjvdead.htm
http://www.av1611.org/nkjv.html
http://crossroad.to/articles2/006/da-vinci-code.htm
http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=opusdei
TruthSeeker24
A Response.
Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:11
72.218.92.240
Aho is the same one saying that 33rd Degree Freemason Henry Ford is a great source. Barbara Aho supports the palgarized Proctocols of the Elders of Zion (which promotes anti-Semitism). That's a lie. There is no such thing as a modern Pierre de Sion as Aho lies about. The ancient Peirre de Sion died in the Middle Ages. A Nazi Plantard created a fake Pierre de sion in the 20th century. Marrano Jewish people existed, yes. Also, this doesn't omit the wicked history of the Vatican from the slave trade, the Inquistion, the assaults against the Waldensian, WWII, the Ecumencial Movement, and other incidents. I will research if the Opus Dei founder was really Jewish since Aho made that accusation before. I don't trust Aho at all since she uses false sources before. Even if that is the case, the Vatican/Jesuit leaders control Opus Dei. Gentile Javier EchevarrÃa RodrÃguez is the hed of Opus Dei today. Also, the Vatican is a wicked organization because its doctrines are nonewhere near Biblical. Also, Samuel Alito and Nancy Pelosi are Roman Catholics. Alito is apart of the K of C and notes find that Alito might be of the Opus Dei as well. Opus Dei is a wicked organization. The K of C were created by Gentile Roman Catholics. Not to mention that the Constantian Order, the K of C, the Pilgrim Society, the Jesuits, etc. ought to be exposed as well.
There is no evidence that Alito is a cypto Jew at all. There is no evidence that Pelosi has total Jewish ancestry at all (possibly only on her mother side). Most Supreme Court Justices are Catholics. They aren't typical Roman Catholics. They are strict Roman Catholics who submit themselves to the Papacy. I wonder why you legitimately criticize evil Zionists, but refuse to expose the Vatican. I will expose both. The Vatican was wicked since its formation. Funny you quote from Barbara Aho's literature when Aho follows the Jesuit invention of the pre-trib rapture and supports the corrupt triqueta-logo having NKJV Bible.
By Timothy (TruthSeeker24)
_________________
Links to back up what I say:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priory_of_Sion
http://www.davinci-the-movie.com/priory-of-sion-3.html
http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/nkjv_one_world_church.html
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/protocols.html
http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/whatabout-nkjv.html
http://jesus-is-lord.com/nkjvdead.htm
http://www.av1611.org/nkjv.html
http://crossroad.to/articles2/006/da-vinci-code.htm
http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=opusdei
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Pro-Prostitution and Pro-Fornication Quotes from the Birth Control Review
View quotes full screen
Pro-Prostitution and Pro-Fornication Quotes from the Birth Control Review
1917
"All the children you now see are suitably dressed; they look now as neat as formerly only the children of the village clergymen did. In the families of the laborers there is now a better personal and general hygiene, a finer moral and intellectual development. All this has become possible by limitation of the number of children in these families. It may be that now and then this preventive teaching has caused illicit intercourse but, on the whole, morality is now on a much higher level and mercenary prostitution, with its demoralizing consequences and propagation of continuous diseases, is on the decline."
Dr. J. Rutgers of the Neo-Malthusian League of Holland. "After Thirty-Five Years of Birth Control." Birth Control Review, Volume I, Number 3 (March 1917), page 14.
"One of the strongest arguments of our moralists and purists is that the knowledge of contraception would lead the young to enter upon forbidden sexual relations. Granted that this may happen in a number of instances, the benefit derived from a diminution of venereal diseases, a greater number of happy and successful marriages among the younger people, fewer but better and healthier offspring, instead of an unrestricted procreation of the underfed, the tuberculous, the alcoholic, the degenerate, the feeble-minded and insane, would more than outweigh the isolated instances of sexual intercourse prior to marriage."
S. Adolphus Knopf, M.D. "An Arsenal of Argument." Birth Control Review, Volume I, Numbers 4 and 5 (April-May 1917), page 8.
1918
"As for the argument that many girls would become immoral were it not for the fear of pregnancy, I feel that it would be far better for a few more girls to become immoral without any illegitimate children to be born, than for a large number of fatherless children to be born yearly and countless girls driven to a life of prostitution, because of either uncontrolled passion or seduction by some man for whom there is more love than prudent feeling."
Claude T. Smith. "The Real Immorality." Birth Control Review, Volume II, Number 4 (April 1918), page 14.
1921
"Every embrace of love is a new phase of being ) a new sublimation of consciousness ) a fresh inspiration of life. Even if love touches lips over the bars surrounding our conventional breeding-places, would it be wise to suppress, if we could, the divinity in our souls; to destroy the poetry and the spice in our lives with puny and puerile laws? For my own part, I thank whatever gods there are that we can not!"
From "Some Aspects of Adultery," a study by Dr. Ralcy Husted Bell, Birth Control Review, Volume V, Number 6 (June 1921), page 10.
1924
"Birth control makes possible such clear-cut distinctions between mating and parenthood that it might be expected to produce radical changes in theories of sex attitude or relationship, forcing the discard of many an argument for personal suppression for the good of children or the honor of the family, and forcing redefinition of concepts of honor and sincerity between the sexes."
"Press Clippings: Elsie Clews Parsons on Birth Control." Birth Control Review, Volume VIII, Number 6 (June 1924), page 190.
1925
"If women are the ones primarily leading the present "sex uproar," it is because they are fundamentally less prudish than men ... Freedom of action on the part of women has brought with it a desire to attain the heights of love enjoyed by men, heights which could make Malthus, famous for his "Essay on the Principle of Population" say, "Perhaps there is scarcely a man who has once experienced the genuine delight of virtuous love ..."
Percy L. Clark, Jr. "Is Love Worth Saving?" Birth Control Review, Volume IX, Number 2 (February 1925), page 42.
"Many people fear birth control because they are told that it will increase extramarital immorality. They do not stop to consider whether if true (which is open to much doubt) this might be a low price to pay for the normal advance gained in avoiding the hideous immorality of enforced maternity and of easing that population pressure which bids fair to be fruitful cause of international discord."
"Population and the Food Supply: National Scientific Bodies Forecast the Future." Birth Control Review, Volume IX, Number 2 (February 1925), page 53.
"Experience has amply demonstrated the evils of attempting to suppress the gratification of this impulse, and its utter futility, except in rare subnormal individuals ... To the accusation that the general knowledge of contraceptive practices will increase promiscuity by "making vice safe," we simply reply that the pressure of population leads to celibacy, delayed marriage, and unspeakable housing conditions in which chastity is almost impossible."
Charles V. Drysdale. "The Neo-Malthusian Philosophy: Part II." Birth Control Review, Volume IX, Number 6 (June 1925), page 181.
1928
"What does the World League for Sexual Reform aim at?
"It aims at being the headquarters of a campaign against a false sexual morality, a false morality, to which already endless numbers of human beings have been sacrificed, and which continues daily to demand its victims.
"In this fight we mean to use exclusively those mental weapons and those facts, which sexual science (in the widest sense) gives us.
"What is out of accord with the laws of nature and science can never be ethically right or truly moral. Where opposition exists between the forces of nature and of society (as, for example, in the population question) one must be at pains to do away with this opposition by using the conscious will of mankind to bring these forces into harmonious cooperation.
"We are unable to recognize as binding the varying rules prescribed at different times by the moment. We can recognize only what is in agreement with the teachings of life and love.
"The following ten points deserve special consideration:
1. Marriage reform. Wedlock must be raised to the position of a living comradeship between two people. This necessitates a reform in the marriage contract, conjugal rights and divorce.
2. The position of women as members of society. Women have not by any means everywhere as yet won the equal rights that are their due in political, economic, social and sexual spheres.
3. Birth Control i.e. greater sense of responsibility in the begetting of children. We believe in making harmless contraceptives known, combat on the other hand both abortion and the penalizing of abortion.
4. Eugenics in the sense of Nietzsche's words: "You shall not merely continue the race, but move it upward!"
5. A fair judgment of those who are unsuited to marriage, above all the intermediate sexual types.
6. Tolerance of free sexual relations, especially protection of the unmarried mother and the child born out of wedlock.
7. The prevention of prostitution and venereal disease.
8. The conception of aberrations of sexual desire not as criminal, sinful or vicious but as a more or less pathological phenomenon.
9. The setting up of a code of sexual law, which does not interfere with the mutual sexual will of grown-up persons.
10. The question of sexual education and enlightenment.
"All these points have in the last fifty years been the subject of lively discussions, which have not only often fundamentally altered the whole conception, but also the whole organization of sexual life. We can in this sense speak of a sexual crisis. The old morality with its terrible sexual misery still has the upper hand, and the human prejudices and condemnation are still heaped higher."
"News Notes." Birth Control Review, Volume XII, Number 7 (July 1928), page 215.
1930
"The refusal of contraceptive information to the unmarried ... is a highly expensive policy to the taxpayer. It is an even more expensive policy from the point of view of the Eugenist. If the laws of heredity are valid, it frequently means an insistence on the continuance of poor stock, and a multiplication of those least fitted to pass on the torch of life to future generations."
Annie G. Porritt. "A Question of Morality." Birth Control Review, Volume XIV, Number 3 (March 1930), pages 74 and 75.
"Adultery should not be considered as a grounds for divorce. Adultery in the physical sense, at least, should be considered a natural consequence of a modern marriage. Where in the past, only men were adulterous, and that clandestinely, women should not have the same privilege of having extramarital sex affairs. Russell believes that these adulteries, when once we recognize the wisdom of them, will facilitate rather than mar marriage as an institution ... "What has Russell said that has caused such a furore of concern and confusion? To begin with he has stressed the wisdom of pre-marital intercourse, and pointed out that women who are virgins are seldom equipped to choose fitting husbands for their marriage. The virgin is naive, and, therefore, without that sexual experience and wisdom which are necessary to an intelligent selection of a mate."
Favorable review of Bertrand Russell's book Marriage and Morals in V.F. Calverton. "Morals in Search of an Answer." Birth Control Review, Volume XIV, Number 3 (March 1930), pages 75 and 76.
"Furthermore, it is his [William J. Robinson's] conviction that the profession of prostitution should be declared perfectly legal and legitimate, which would tend to eliminate the evils that are now incidental to its practice ... Cease hounding, persecuting and humiliating her ... and she will at once begin to resist the terrible exploitation to which she is subjected on all sides."
William J. Fielding. "Prostitution ) Past, Present and Future." Birth Control Review, Volume XIV, Number 10 (October 1930), page 285.
"The great ideal is still a happy love, leading into marriage and parenthood. But it is precisely that they may gain that ideal that so many of them [college women] are deciding that marriage must not be confounded either with love or with sex. They would remove the confusion of sex as far as possible from parenthood. For a good lover may not be a good husband, and a good husband may not make a good father. The trouble with the present system is that it has attempted to imprison love in sex and in marriage.
"I do not think that youth is tending toward immorality, nor that is [sic] can do so while its ideals are set so high. Out of the temporary confusion due to changing customs, there must emerge a higher morality. Youth would set free what has been long a captive. May the marriages of tomorrow find a new freedom!"
"An Unofficial Questionnaire: Seventy College Girls Express Their Opinions." Birth Control Review, Volume XIV, Number 10 (October 1930), page 287.
"The gale of laughter which swept the magistrate's court in New York when Judge Rosenbluth asked if doctors required marriage licenses before treating patients should have disposed for good and all of the desire among birth controllers to pass legislation restricting information to married people ... An unwanted child in an unmarried woman's home is not in a more enviable position than most unwanted children in legal families."
"A Symposium on Nullification and Repeal." Birth Control Review, Volume XIV, Number 11 (November 1930), page 309.
1931
"The greater facility of divorce aids the formation of the most satisfactory union. A greater freedom between the sexes before marriage, even if it has sometimes led to license, is not only itself beneficial, but the proper method of preparing for a more intimate permanent union. And the exercise of contraceptive control is the indispensable method of selecting the best possibilities of offspring and excluding from the world those who ought never to be born."
Havelock Ellis. "Marriage ) An Enduring Institution." Birth Control Review, Volume XV, Number 6 (June 1931), pages 166 and 167.
"I find myself in complete agreement with Havelock Ellis in his article on Marriage ) An Enduring Institution. I believe that monogamy is the ideal to which society should approximate. There should be nothing compulsory about it. Marriage should be made harder and divorce easier. Plenty of sex education and probably sane and decent sex experience should precede permanent marriage. The new sexology, far from destroying marriage and the family, is the
only thing which can make possible a happy and enduring marriage for the majority of mankind. Most marital discord is due to absence of sex knowledge and to sexual maladjustment, both of which would be eliminated if we were civilized enough to disseminate scientific knowledge on sex matters and to permit pre-conjugal sex experience.
"... Obviously, the bonds of theological and legal intimidation are bursting. The new family order must rest upon intelligence, freedom, and adequate information."
Harry Elmer Barnes. "Comments on Ellis' Article: Freedom and Knowledge Needed." Birth Control Review, Volume XV, Number 7 (July 1931), page 210.
"... And Mr. Packard seems to believe that the medical men are in some way capable of being policemen of our private affairs. Is it not just as "benighted, illogical and absurd" for one to assume that contraception can, or ought to be, restricted to married people as it is to oppose all ideas of birth control? ... I sympathize immensely with nullification [mass disobedience of the law]. All liberals must practice such nullification of many laws ..."
Gordon McWhirter of Berkeley, California. Letter to the Birth Control Review, Volume XV, Number 10 (October 1931), page 302.
"In an effort to secure representative opinion on the supposedly promiscuous tendencies of women of today, with sidelights on the attitude of men, the writer interviewed Mrs. Marjorie Prevost, assistant to Margaret Sanger in the newly established Marriage Relationship Clinic, Dr. Isabel Beck, a gynecologist whose work includes instruction in Social Hygiene in the Y.W.C.A., and Mr. J. Edward Sproul, Program Section Secretary of the National Council of Y.M.C.A.'s. All of these authorities agreed that modern conditions have brought into existence not a new type, rather a new outlook and a new attitude; none was ready to admit that modern men and women differ from their predecessors except in superficialities."
Howard K. Hollister. "The Disappearing Double Standard." Birth Control Review, Volume XV, Number 11 (November 1931), page 314.
1932
"It [birth control] has the authority of that upon which all the rest of civilization is constructed, and to which intelligence directs us, the authority of sensuous enjoyment not merely physical pleasure, but esthetic satisfaction, which can only be had through physical pleasure."
Gordon McWhirter. "The Fundamental Reason for Birth Control." Birth Control Review, Volume XVI, Numbers 7 and 8 (July-August 1932), page 222.
"It appears, to say the least, highly improbable that in a radically rationalized society sexual reactions and behavior will acquire a uniformity which has never existed in the most coercive societies. With the disappearance of the most coercive moral and economic values, promiscuous behavior will become easier. But so, on the other hand, will relatively monogamous association. To an enormous extent the conditions fatal to the latter and its common failure are the effects of an un-rational and coercive society. With the disappearance of those irrational conditions more than half of the causes which wreck the close association of human relations between men and women would no longer exist.
"There can be little doubt that in a more rationalized society the relations between the sexes will present a combination of promiscuous and monogamous behavior ) as they do now, and as they have done in every period of mankind's career. Promiscuity will perhaps be more general, though probably less in degree. It will have lost the attraction which revolt against moral and social coercion's imparts to it. The contrast between it and uncoerced monogamous relations will have lost the fierce opposition imparted to it by moral zeal and by revolt against it.
"From the moment that such a contrast becomes shifted from the field of moral to that of hedonistic values, from a matter of obligation to one of freedom to do as one pleases, it ceases to have the portentous importance with which it has been invested by moral authoritarianism. To disapprove of people's tastes is not the same as to disapprove of their morals. Condemnation or commendation of either monogamy or promiscuity becomes irrelevant."
Robert Griffault. "Will Monogamy Die Out?" Birth Control Review, Volume XVI, Numbers 7 and 8 (July-August 1932), page 223.
"Another international gathering, the Fifth Congress of the World League for Sexual Reform on a Scientific Basis, was held in Brno, Czechoslovakia, September 20-26. According to the preliminary program, qualitative and quantitative Birth Control, Population Problems, Marriage Reform, Sexual Education, and Prostitution were fully discussed. The chief points of the League's policy are:
1. Political, economic, and sexual equality of men and women.
2. The liberation from marriage (and especially divorce) from the present Church and State tyranny.
3. Birth Control, so that procreation may be undertaken only deliberately, and with a due sense of responsibility.
4. Race betterment by the application of the knowledge of Eugenics.
5. Protection of the unmarried mother and the illegitimate child."
"News Notes." Birth Control Review, Volume XVI, Number 10 (October 1932), page 250.
1933
"Mr. [Havelock] Ellis advances as his basic thesis that all sex activities that lead to normal sex fulfillment are normal."
Henry G. Alsberg's review of Psychology of Sex by Havelock Ellis. Birth Control Review, Volume XVII, Number 7 (July 1933), page 178.
Pro-Prostitution and Pro-Fornication Quotes from the Birth Control Review
1917
"All the children you now see are suitably dressed; they look now as neat as formerly only the children of the village clergymen did. In the families of the laborers there is now a better personal and general hygiene, a finer moral and intellectual development. All this has become possible by limitation of the number of children in these families. It may be that now and then this preventive teaching has caused illicit intercourse but, on the whole, morality is now on a much higher level and mercenary prostitution, with its demoralizing consequences and propagation of continuous diseases, is on the decline."
Dr. J. Rutgers of the Neo-Malthusian League of Holland. "After Thirty-Five Years of Birth Control." Birth Control Review, Volume I, Number 3 (March 1917), page 14.
"One of the strongest arguments of our moralists and purists is that the knowledge of contraception would lead the young to enter upon forbidden sexual relations. Granted that this may happen in a number of instances, the benefit derived from a diminution of venereal diseases, a greater number of happy and successful marriages among the younger people, fewer but better and healthier offspring, instead of an unrestricted procreation of the underfed, the tuberculous, the alcoholic, the degenerate, the feeble-minded and insane, would more than outweigh the isolated instances of sexual intercourse prior to marriage."
S. Adolphus Knopf, M.D. "An Arsenal of Argument." Birth Control Review, Volume I, Numbers 4 and 5 (April-May 1917), page 8.
1918
"As for the argument that many girls would become immoral were it not for the fear of pregnancy, I feel that it would be far better for a few more girls to become immoral without any illegitimate children to be born, than for a large number of fatherless children to be born yearly and countless girls driven to a life of prostitution, because of either uncontrolled passion or seduction by some man for whom there is more love than prudent feeling."
Claude T. Smith. "The Real Immorality." Birth Control Review, Volume II, Number 4 (April 1918), page 14.
1921
"Every embrace of love is a new phase of being ) a new sublimation of consciousness ) a fresh inspiration of life. Even if love touches lips over the bars surrounding our conventional breeding-places, would it be wise to suppress, if we could, the divinity in our souls; to destroy the poetry and the spice in our lives with puny and puerile laws? For my own part, I thank whatever gods there are that we can not!"
From "Some Aspects of Adultery," a study by Dr. Ralcy Husted Bell, Birth Control Review, Volume V, Number 6 (June 1921), page 10.
1924
"Birth control makes possible such clear-cut distinctions between mating and parenthood that it might be expected to produce radical changes in theories of sex attitude or relationship, forcing the discard of many an argument for personal suppression for the good of children or the honor of the family, and forcing redefinition of concepts of honor and sincerity between the sexes."
"Press Clippings: Elsie Clews Parsons on Birth Control." Birth Control Review, Volume VIII, Number 6 (June 1924), page 190.
1925
"If women are the ones primarily leading the present "sex uproar," it is because they are fundamentally less prudish than men ... Freedom of action on the part of women has brought with it a desire to attain the heights of love enjoyed by men, heights which could make Malthus, famous for his "Essay on the Principle of Population" say, "Perhaps there is scarcely a man who has once experienced the genuine delight of virtuous love ..."
Percy L. Clark, Jr. "Is Love Worth Saving?" Birth Control Review, Volume IX, Number 2 (February 1925), page 42.
"Many people fear birth control because they are told that it will increase extramarital immorality. They do not stop to consider whether if true (which is open to much doubt) this might be a low price to pay for the normal advance gained in avoiding the hideous immorality of enforced maternity and of easing that population pressure which bids fair to be fruitful cause of international discord."
"Population and the Food Supply: National Scientific Bodies Forecast the Future." Birth Control Review, Volume IX, Number 2 (February 1925), page 53.
"Experience has amply demonstrated the evils of attempting to suppress the gratification of this impulse, and its utter futility, except in rare subnormal individuals ... To the accusation that the general knowledge of contraceptive practices will increase promiscuity by "making vice safe," we simply reply that the pressure of population leads to celibacy, delayed marriage, and unspeakable housing conditions in which chastity is almost impossible."
Charles V. Drysdale. "The Neo-Malthusian Philosophy: Part II." Birth Control Review, Volume IX, Number 6 (June 1925), page 181.
1928
"What does the World League for Sexual Reform aim at?
"It aims at being the headquarters of a campaign against a false sexual morality, a false morality, to which already endless numbers of human beings have been sacrificed, and which continues daily to demand its victims.
"In this fight we mean to use exclusively those mental weapons and those facts, which sexual science (in the widest sense) gives us.
"What is out of accord with the laws of nature and science can never be ethically right or truly moral. Where opposition exists between the forces of nature and of society (as, for example, in the population question) one must be at pains to do away with this opposition by using the conscious will of mankind to bring these forces into harmonious cooperation.
"We are unable to recognize as binding the varying rules prescribed at different times by the moment. We can recognize only what is in agreement with the teachings of life and love.
"The following ten points deserve special consideration:
1. Marriage reform. Wedlock must be raised to the position of a living comradeship between two people. This necessitates a reform in the marriage contract, conjugal rights and divorce.
2. The position of women as members of society. Women have not by any means everywhere as yet won the equal rights that are their due in political, economic, social and sexual spheres.
3. Birth Control i.e. greater sense of responsibility in the begetting of children. We believe in making harmless contraceptives known, combat on the other hand both abortion and the penalizing of abortion.
4. Eugenics in the sense of Nietzsche's words: "You shall not merely continue the race, but move it upward!"
5. A fair judgment of those who are unsuited to marriage, above all the intermediate sexual types.
6. Tolerance of free sexual relations, especially protection of the unmarried mother and the child born out of wedlock.
7. The prevention of prostitution and venereal disease.
8. The conception of aberrations of sexual desire not as criminal, sinful or vicious but as a more or less pathological phenomenon.
9. The setting up of a code of sexual law, which does not interfere with the mutual sexual will of grown-up persons.
10. The question of sexual education and enlightenment.
"All these points have in the last fifty years been the subject of lively discussions, which have not only often fundamentally altered the whole conception, but also the whole organization of sexual life. We can in this sense speak of a sexual crisis. The old morality with its terrible sexual misery still has the upper hand, and the human prejudices and condemnation are still heaped higher."
"News Notes." Birth Control Review, Volume XII, Number 7 (July 1928), page 215.
1930
"The refusal of contraceptive information to the unmarried ... is a highly expensive policy to the taxpayer. It is an even more expensive policy from the point of view of the Eugenist. If the laws of heredity are valid, it frequently means an insistence on the continuance of poor stock, and a multiplication of those least fitted to pass on the torch of life to future generations."
Annie G. Porritt. "A Question of Morality." Birth Control Review, Volume XIV, Number 3 (March 1930), pages 74 and 75.
"Adultery should not be considered as a grounds for divorce. Adultery in the physical sense, at least, should be considered a natural consequence of a modern marriage. Where in the past, only men were adulterous, and that clandestinely, women should not have the same privilege of having extramarital sex affairs. Russell believes that these adulteries, when once we recognize the wisdom of them, will facilitate rather than mar marriage as an institution ... "What has Russell said that has caused such a furore of concern and confusion? To begin with he has stressed the wisdom of pre-marital intercourse, and pointed out that women who are virgins are seldom equipped to choose fitting husbands for their marriage. The virgin is naive, and, therefore, without that sexual experience and wisdom which are necessary to an intelligent selection of a mate."
Favorable review of Bertrand Russell's book Marriage and Morals in V.F. Calverton. "Morals in Search of an Answer." Birth Control Review, Volume XIV, Number 3 (March 1930), pages 75 and 76.
"Furthermore, it is his [William J. Robinson's] conviction that the profession of prostitution should be declared perfectly legal and legitimate, which would tend to eliminate the evils that are now incidental to its practice ... Cease hounding, persecuting and humiliating her ... and she will at once begin to resist the terrible exploitation to which she is subjected on all sides."
William J. Fielding. "Prostitution ) Past, Present and Future." Birth Control Review, Volume XIV, Number 10 (October 1930), page 285.
"The great ideal is still a happy love, leading into marriage and parenthood. But it is precisely that they may gain that ideal that so many of them [college women] are deciding that marriage must not be confounded either with love or with sex. They would remove the confusion of sex as far as possible from parenthood. For a good lover may not be a good husband, and a good husband may not make a good father. The trouble with the present system is that it has attempted to imprison love in sex and in marriage.
"I do not think that youth is tending toward immorality, nor that is [sic] can do so while its ideals are set so high. Out of the temporary confusion due to changing customs, there must emerge a higher morality. Youth would set free what has been long a captive. May the marriages of tomorrow find a new freedom!"
"An Unofficial Questionnaire: Seventy College Girls Express Their Opinions." Birth Control Review, Volume XIV, Number 10 (October 1930), page 287.
"The gale of laughter which swept the magistrate's court in New York when Judge Rosenbluth asked if doctors required marriage licenses before treating patients should have disposed for good and all of the desire among birth controllers to pass legislation restricting information to married people ... An unwanted child in an unmarried woman's home is not in a more enviable position than most unwanted children in legal families."
"A Symposium on Nullification and Repeal." Birth Control Review, Volume XIV, Number 11 (November 1930), page 309.
1931
"The greater facility of divorce aids the formation of the most satisfactory union. A greater freedom between the sexes before marriage, even if it has sometimes led to license, is not only itself beneficial, but the proper method of preparing for a more intimate permanent union. And the exercise of contraceptive control is the indispensable method of selecting the best possibilities of offspring and excluding from the world those who ought never to be born."
Havelock Ellis. "Marriage ) An Enduring Institution." Birth Control Review, Volume XV, Number 6 (June 1931), pages 166 and 167.
"I find myself in complete agreement with Havelock Ellis in his article on Marriage ) An Enduring Institution. I believe that monogamy is the ideal to which society should approximate. There should be nothing compulsory about it. Marriage should be made harder and divorce easier. Plenty of sex education and probably sane and decent sex experience should precede permanent marriage. The new sexology, far from destroying marriage and the family, is the
only thing which can make possible a happy and enduring marriage for the majority of mankind. Most marital discord is due to absence of sex knowledge and to sexual maladjustment, both of which would be eliminated if we were civilized enough to disseminate scientific knowledge on sex matters and to permit pre-conjugal sex experience.
"... Obviously, the bonds of theological and legal intimidation are bursting. The new family order must rest upon intelligence, freedom, and adequate information."
Harry Elmer Barnes. "Comments on Ellis' Article: Freedom and Knowledge Needed." Birth Control Review, Volume XV, Number 7 (July 1931), page 210.
"... And Mr. Packard seems to believe that the medical men are in some way capable of being policemen of our private affairs. Is it not just as "benighted, illogical and absurd" for one to assume that contraception can, or ought to be, restricted to married people as it is to oppose all ideas of birth control? ... I sympathize immensely with nullification [mass disobedience of the law]. All liberals must practice such nullification of many laws ..."
Gordon McWhirter of Berkeley, California. Letter to the Birth Control Review, Volume XV, Number 10 (October 1931), page 302.
"In an effort to secure representative opinion on the supposedly promiscuous tendencies of women of today, with sidelights on the attitude of men, the writer interviewed Mrs. Marjorie Prevost, assistant to Margaret Sanger in the newly established Marriage Relationship Clinic, Dr. Isabel Beck, a gynecologist whose work includes instruction in Social Hygiene in the Y.W.C.A., and Mr. J. Edward Sproul, Program Section Secretary of the National Council of Y.M.C.A.'s. All of these authorities agreed that modern conditions have brought into existence not a new type, rather a new outlook and a new attitude; none was ready to admit that modern men and women differ from their predecessors except in superficialities."
Howard K. Hollister. "The Disappearing Double Standard." Birth Control Review, Volume XV, Number 11 (November 1931), page 314.
1932
"It [birth control] has the authority of that upon which all the rest of civilization is constructed, and to which intelligence directs us, the authority of sensuous enjoyment not merely physical pleasure, but esthetic satisfaction, which can only be had through physical pleasure."
Gordon McWhirter. "The Fundamental Reason for Birth Control." Birth Control Review, Volume XVI, Numbers 7 and 8 (July-August 1932), page 222.
"It appears, to say the least, highly improbable that in a radically rationalized society sexual reactions and behavior will acquire a uniformity which has never existed in the most coercive societies. With the disappearance of the most coercive moral and economic values, promiscuous behavior will become easier. But so, on the other hand, will relatively monogamous association. To an enormous extent the conditions fatal to the latter and its common failure are the effects of an un-rational and coercive society. With the disappearance of those irrational conditions more than half of the causes which wreck the close association of human relations between men and women would no longer exist.
"There can be little doubt that in a more rationalized society the relations between the sexes will present a combination of promiscuous and monogamous behavior ) as they do now, and as they have done in every period of mankind's career. Promiscuity will perhaps be more general, though probably less in degree. It will have lost the attraction which revolt against moral and social coercion's imparts to it. The contrast between it and uncoerced monogamous relations will have lost the fierce opposition imparted to it by moral zeal and by revolt against it.
"From the moment that such a contrast becomes shifted from the field of moral to that of hedonistic values, from a matter of obligation to one of freedom to do as one pleases, it ceases to have the portentous importance with which it has been invested by moral authoritarianism. To disapprove of people's tastes is not the same as to disapprove of their morals. Condemnation or commendation of either monogamy or promiscuity becomes irrelevant."
Robert Griffault. "Will Monogamy Die Out?" Birth Control Review, Volume XVI, Numbers 7 and 8 (July-August 1932), page 223.
"Another international gathering, the Fifth Congress of the World League for Sexual Reform on a Scientific Basis, was held in Brno, Czechoslovakia, September 20-26. According to the preliminary program, qualitative and quantitative Birth Control, Population Problems, Marriage Reform, Sexual Education, and Prostitution were fully discussed. The chief points of the League's policy are:
1. Political, economic, and sexual equality of men and women.
2. The liberation from marriage (and especially divorce) from the present Church and State tyranny.
3. Birth Control, so that procreation may be undertaken only deliberately, and with a due sense of responsibility.
4. Race betterment by the application of the knowledge of Eugenics.
5. Protection of the unmarried mother and the illegitimate child."
"News Notes." Birth Control Review, Volume XVI, Number 10 (October 1932), page 250.
1933
"Mr. [Havelock] Ellis advances as his basic thesis that all sex activities that lead to normal sex fulfillment are normal."
Henry G. Alsberg's review of Psychology of Sex by Havelock Ellis. Birth Control Review, Volume XVII, Number 7 (July 1933), page 178.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)